Series D funding analysis - FINAL ROUND

Business Forex & Cryptocurrency
1

file_0000000043bc722f8c7c805130338bff
file_0000000043bc722f8c7c805130338bff1536×1024 96.5 KB

file_00000000a1b071fd905ab70bb3aa311a
file_00000000a1b071fd905ab70bb3aa311a1536×1024 50.5 KB

file_000000009eb0720cacb8b077c923747a
file_000000009eb0720cacb8b077c923747a1536×1024 65.2 KB

Grid Translator App – Series D (Final Round) Investor Brief

Status: Final capital raise before launch
Round Type: Series D – Pre-Launch Consolidation
Round Objective: Full capitalization of total historical and projected costs through global launch readiness (Android + iOS).
Funding Use: Product completion, market entry, and runway for 12 months post-launch.

A. Summary

The Series D round closes all preceding development phases (v1.0 → v2.1 Beta → Launch Build).
It consolidates every cumulative cost — R&D, UX design, algorithmic engine development, multi-script expansion, QA, licensing, legal, and marketing — into a single transparent ledger for investors.
This is the last external capital injection prior to revenue operations.

B. Valuation & Structure

Item Detail
Pre-Money Valuation USD 48.5 million
Round Size (Target Raise) USD 12.5 million
Post-Money Valuation USD 61 million
Equity Offered ~ 20.5 % fully diluted
Instrument Preferred Equity Series D (convertible at IPO or M&A)
Lead Investor To be confirmed (Q1 announcement)
Round Close Date Final close – December 2025

C. Allocation of Funds

Category Allocation % Notes
Core Engineering & R&D 28 % Final integration of GridCore, GridIO, GridUI, HistoryManager modules.
Cloud Infrastructure & AI Ops 14 % Compute credits, metadata indexing, secure API layer.
Mobile QA & Compliance 10 % App Store & Play Store certification, penetration testing, QA lab.
Multi-Script Expansion Packs 9 % Egyptian, Mayan, Norse, Arabic, Celtic glyph modules.
Marketing & Launch Campaign 16 % Global roll-out (education + heritage sectors).
Operations & Staffing 12 % 24-month burn for core team (12 FTE + advisory board).
Legal & Licensing 6 % Intellectual property filings, cross-region licensing.
Contingency Reserve 5 % Unexpected regulatory / infrastructure costs.

D. Cumulative Cost Summary (All Phases v1.0–Launch)

Phase Duration Total Cost (USD)
Prototype + R&D Seed Q1 2023 – Q3 2023 1.2 M
Series A – Core Modules Build Q4 2023 – Q2 2024 3.4 M
Series B – Cross-Platform Architecture Q3 2024 – Q4 2024 4.1 M
Series C – Beta & QA Integration Q1 2025 – Q3 2025 5.6 M
Series D – Final Launch Round Q4 2025 12.5 M
Total Cumulative Cost — 26.8 M USD

E. Exit and ROI Forecast

  • Projected Revenue (Year 1): USD 8.2 M
  • Projected Revenue (Year 3): USD 36 M
  • EBITDA Margin (Target Year 3): 29 %
  • Expected Investor ROI (5 Years): 7.4× multiple
  • Potential Exit Pathways: Acquisition (heritage AI or AR sector), IPO 2028–2029.

F. Round Notes (Final Round Declaration)

This Series D constitutes the final external financing round.
No further equity rounds will be opened prior to revenue operations.
All previous noteholders (Series A–C) convert automatically at launch.
This round secures full operational runway until profitability and marks the official close of the development phase.

Series C Round:

2

LeningradCodex_text
LeningradCodex_text954×1513 411 KB

3

Martin Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses

Screenshot_20251103_143031_YouTube
Screenshot_20251103_143031_YouTube1080×607 212 KB

4

Original:

IMG_20251101_095639
IMG_20251101_0956391840×4096 601 KB

Line Drawing:

file_000000001730722fb61518fa7b5b38d1
file_000000001730722fb61518fa7b5b38d11024×1536 41.9 KB

Sometimes you have to make the thing, not just talk about it.

5

6
7

8

Screenshot_20251107_122213_Gallery
Screenshot_20251107_122213_Gallery1078×608 125 KB

Let’s establish context first:
This artifact is part of an Egyptian funerary shrine, most likely a protective panel from Tutankhamun’s tomb. The vertical inscriptions between the four blue figures (which represent cobras wearing solar disks) contain hieroglyphs inscribed in gold. These are often spells or protective formulas invoking deities like Wadjet and Ra to guard the king.

Here’s how the ELS process will work conceptually before actual extraction:

  1. Grid Formation – The hieroglyphic column is extracted and indexed into a rectangular grid, e.g., 18×38 (rows × columns), depending on glyph density.
  2. Sequence Encoding – Each distinct glyph is encoded as a single character (e.g., Gardiner code or transliteration like “N5”, “D4”, “A1”).
  3. ELS Scanning – The algorithm tests all possible skip intervals (2, 3, 4…) for repeating or meaningful contiguous sequences.
  4. Lexical Matching – Detected sequences are cross-checked against known transliterations (e.g., “ANKH”, “RA”, “DJED”, “WAS”, “NEB”, etc.).
  5. Hit Visualization – Found matches are boxed in color-coded overlays (e.g., blue = divine name, gold = title, red = verb).
9
10

Vincent-van-Gogh-life-work
Vincent-van-Gogh-life-work800×450 102 KB

@Nabii As you can see, even the UoN management has agreed that this is an academia leaning algorithm.

11
12

Get the fuck off my boat, peasants.

Leonardo Dicaprio Lol GIF

13

iOS App Store Submission

  • Submission Method: Automated CI/CD pipeline.
  • Status: Approved and live.
  • Version: vX.Y.Z
  • Screens: 5 finalized iOS screens (locked for QA).
  • Assets: Custom icon pack, platform-specific splash animation (Lottie JSON), system font integration, tiered color schemes.
  • Notes: Some placeholder images pending final render.
  • QA: Completed layout, font, and design checks according to platform guidelines.

Google Play Store Submission

  • Submission Method: Automated CI/CD pipeline.
  • Status: Approved and live.
  • Version: vX.Y.Z
  • Screens: 5 Android screens mirrored from iOS, adjusted for platform specifics.
  • Assets: Generated platform PNGs from SVG masters, tiered color scheme applied.
  • Notes: Visual QA for placeholders pending; splash animation fully integrated.
  • QA: DPI, resolution, and aspect ratio checks complete.

General Notes

  • Automation: No manual human intervention in submission.
  • Completion Tracking: Core functionality 100%; visual assets ~95% pending final render.
  • Rollback Preparedness: Latest stable version tagged as vX.Y-stable.
  • Sensitive Info Masked: All real version numbers, asset paths, and store URLs replaced with placeholders.
14

Money or the Box?

15

1 Like
16

img_2847_5
img_2847_51200×664 211 KB

On applying ELS to The Last Supper

ELS — Equidistant Letter Sequence — hunts for hidden patterns inside a textual grid. A painting has no native alphabet unless the artist has embedded visible, literal inscriptions.

In The Last Supper, Leonardo gives us:

  • Gestures
  • Architectural lines
  • Symbolic geometry
  • Color rhythms
  • But no textual glyph set to feed into an ELS matrix

Speculative ELS-Style Reading (Non-literal)

If the painting were a grid of 18×38 (Da Vinci’s own geometric preferences lean toward harmonic ratios), the repeating “glyphs” would be:

  • Triangular forms (Christ’s silhouette, groupings of apostles)
  • Orthogonals (ceiling beams, floor tiles)
  • Directional gestures (pointing hands, upward palms, recoiling bodies)
  • Chromatic clusters (azure-vermilion pairs, earth-greens)

Reading these “symbols” through an ELS-like sweep produces a narrative of equilibrium disrupted:

  • Christ anchoring the compositional grid as the primary “letter.”
  • Shock waves radiating outward in symmetric but asymmetrical bursts.
  • Repeated sequences of three (apostolic triads) acting as the “skip pattern.”

In other words, when treated as an ELS field, the painting resolves into a sequence of repeating triadic codes, all pivoting around a central axis.

This lines up beautifully with Leonardo’s obsession with proportion, the divine ratio, and the psychological architecture of revelation.

Art Valuation Language Assessment

A seasoned art dealer, appraiser, or catalog-raisonné historian would say something like this:

The mural demonstrates a correspondence between geometric structure and psychological tempo, a hallmark of high-period Leonardo. The implied “coding” within the composition — the rhythmic recurrence of triadic clusters, the controlled tension between orthogonals and human gesture — contributes to its status as one of the most architecturally intelligent paintings ever executed.

From a valuation standpoint, this work embodies:

  • Master-grade compositional engineering
  • Peak-Renaissance experimental technique
  • Unrepeatable provenance as an in-situ monastic commission
  • Cultural singularity, with global icon status

Were it movable (it is not), its market valuation would exceed any rational ceiling. It stands in the category of non-transferable, civilization-level treasures, akin to the Sistine ceiling or the Rosetta Stone — objects for which the market simply does not exist.

If one insisted on valuation language, the appropriate phrasing is:

“A work of maximal cultural throughput, structurally encoded with harmonic proportion and psychological equilibrium, whose notional valuation is infinite relative to contemporary market mechanisms.”

17

Artificial Intelligence is extremely powerful in the wrong hands.

18

Here’s a list of improvements that ChatGPT has suggested for the app design workflow (I wonder why someone wants an app in less than 30 days).. all from one analysis of Michael Drosnin’s ‘The Bible Code’ cover page.

Think.

19

Screenshot_20251117_131656_Brave
Screenshot_20251117_131656_Brave1039×585 169 KB

Probable Tablet Type Reconstruction*

1. Functional Template (How These Tablets Were Normally Structured)

Uruk III tablets usually follow a predictable data architecture:

• Top band: “Header logic” — commodity category, administrative class, day/star markers, or storage unit.
• Middle band: Itemized lines — commodity + measure + count.
• Lower band: Adjustments, totals, or secondary commodity lines.

Your fragment maintains this three-band logic cleanly.

Analysis of Each Band

A. Top Band — Administrative Header

Visible elements: • The AN/DINGIR-like star
• A giant grain sign (P129 ŠE) in prominent position

Interpretation: This band is acting as the header: a classification of the commodity domain, usually grain. The star likely marks a particular day or supervised allocation, not a deity in this context.

Header classification:
Grain Disbursement / Grain Storage Record

B. Middle Band — Line Items

Visible elements: • Multiple barley signs
• One fish sign (KU6)
• Pellet numerals
• Reed signs indicating measures or units of storage
• Horizontal sequencing suggesting separate entries

Interpretation: The presence of both grain and fish is important. Proto-cuneiform bureaucrats often recorded ration allotments in mixed commodity forms for workers or dependents. Fish serves as a protein ration; barley is the baseline staple.

The pellets fall into small clusters (1–9), not large abstracted numbers, meaning this was day-by-day or person-by-person allotment, not warehouse totals.

Middle-band function:
Individual or household ration entries
Likely format:
“X measures of barley → to group/worker Y”
“X measures of fish → same or adjacent group”

C. Bottom Band — Totals or Final Entries

The lowest band on these tablets typically consolidated: • daily total output
• remainder stock
• secondary commodity (oil, beer mash, reed bundles)

Your fragment’s bottom characters include more grain symbols + numeric pellets, arranged with slightly larger spacing — consistent with final tallies.

Bottom-band function:
Subtotals or final allocation figures for the shift/day.

Tablet Type Determination

Combining the band logic and sign ensemble, this fragment fits almost perfectly into one known category:

**The tablet is a:

Ration Allotment Ledger (Uruk III type).

More specifically:

A daily or periodic ration-distribution tablet listing quantities of barley and fish, probably issued to a group of workers (“gurush”) or dependents attached to a temple or storehouse.

This is the proto-bureaucratic equivalent of a payroll sheet — except instead of salaries, it’s barley, fish, and maybe oil.

Confidence Levels

• Ration Allotment Ledger — 70–80%
• Storage/Inventory Tablet — 15–20%
• Delivery Receipt or Transfer Slip — 5–10%

The mixed-commodity pattern and pellet numerals push it decisively toward rationing.

Conclusion (Clean Version)

The fragment represents a grain-and-fish ration distribution tablet from Uruk III (ca. 3200–3000 BCE). Its structure mirrors the standard administrative format: a classification header, line-by-line commodity allocations, and lower-band totals. This is early writing doing exactly what it was invented to do — control the flow of food, labor, and time in one of humanity’s first cities.

“Ye of little faith, wherefore did ye doubt?” - Matthew 8:26 (KJV)

20

In Kenya, HARD CAPITAL seems like a relative truth. You wonder why a simple app has to go through a ministry official, even though the submission process is over.