Rwanda Nilote-Bantu Arrangement

I find Rwanda to be funny. The Tutsi used to dominate the Hutu and then when whitoids came they entrenched this arrangement and after the Genocide attempt by the Bantus, normal service has resumed of Tutsi minority rule.

Hutu are of course sub-6-foot subservient Bantoid species while Tutsi are tall cattle herders supremos linked to Nilotic/Cushitic roots. These roots have been muddied by intermarriages and also to sell Tutsi as indigenous to the region in that sea of Bantus. Anyway, this is the natural order of things.

Bantoids sit upon Congo the richest country in the world with minerals, a mighty river, timber and what not but you can see how it has turned out. Similarly, Bantoids also took over the settler colonies of Kenya, Zimbabwe and South Africa then things obviously went backwards.

Joluos in South sudan sit on vast oil fields, arable land and the mightiest river, the nile, but you can see how it has turned out. And FYI tutsi are bantu.

.

.

.

.

1 Like

Hindiot, where do you get your data from? Bantus are taller than nilotes, and born to rule.

.

.

.

.

.

Tutsi are not native. Don’t lie

Uhuru Kenyatta is just a well fed baby. Fed on Kenyan resources including dead elephants

Kwani Jaramogi, kenya’s 1st DP, didnt feed his babies?

.

Nilotes are savage frogs. Bantu are gentle human beings

1 Like

Jobless mbilikimo germanicus onyango atafutiwe kienyeji ya murima apunguze machungu