How money is created

I have painfully watched Ndiis of this world and other people make stupid theories about money and misinform people just because they have a name.

How money is made

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvpbQlQwl0A

http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q1prereleasemoneycreation.pdf#page=1
From the Bank of England’s 2014 Q1 Quarterly Bulletin: The vast majority of money held by the public takes the form of bank deposits. But where the stock of bank deposits comes from is often misunderstood.

One common misconception is that banks act simply as intermediaries, lending out the deposits that savers place with them. In this view deposits are typically ‘created’ by the saving decisions of households, and banks then ‘lend out’ those existing deposits to borrowers, for example to companies looking to finance investment or individuals wanting to purchase houses. In fact, when households choose to save more money in bank accounts, those deposits come simply at the expense of deposits that would have otherwise gone to companies in payment for goods and services. Saving does not by itself increase the deposits or ‘funds available’ for banks to lend. Indeed, viewing banks simply as intermediaries ignores the fact that, in reality in the modern economy, commercial banks are the creators of deposit money. This article explains how, rather than banks lending out deposits that are placed with them, the act of lending creates deposits — the reverse of the sequence typically described in textbooks.(3)

Another common misconception is that the central bank determines the quantity of loans and deposits in the economy by controlling the quantity of central bank money — the so-called ‘money multiplier’ approach. In that view, central banks implement monetary policy by choosing a quantity of reserves. And, because there is assumed to be a constant ratio of broad money to base money, these reserves are then ‘multiplied up’ to a much greater change in bank loans and deposits. For the theory to hold, the amount of reserves must be a binding constraint on lending, and the central bank must directly determine the amount of reserves. While the money multiplier theory can be a useful way of introducing money and banking in economic textbooks, it is not an accurate description of how money is created in reality. Rather than controlling the quantity of reserves, central banks today typically implement monetary policy by setting the price of reserves — that is, interest rates. In reality, neither are reserves a binding constraint on lending, nor does the central bank fix the amount of reserves that are available. As with the relationship between deposits and loans, the relationship between reserves and loans typically operates in the reverse way to that described in some economics textbooks. Banks first decide how much to lend depending on the profitable lending opportunities available to them — which will, crucially, depend on the interest rate set by the Bank of England. It is these lending decisions that determine how many bank deposits are created by the banking system. The amount of bank deposits in turn influences how much central bank money banks want to hold in reserve (to meet withdrawals by the public, make payments to other banks, or meet regulatory liquidity requirements), which is then, in normal times, supplied on demand by the Bank of England. The rest of this article discusses these practices in more detail.

How money is created in reality.
Commercial banks create money, in the form of bank deposits, by making new loans. When a bank makes a loan, for example to someone taking out a mortgage to buy a house, it does not typically do so by giving them thousands of pounds worth of banknotes. Instead, it credits their bank account with a bank deposit of the size of the mortgage. At that moment, new money is created. For this reason, some economists have referred to bank deposits as ‘fountain pen money’, created at the stroke of bankers’ pens when they approve loans.

Me najua pesa hutengezwa Dela rue

Question: Can a bank lend more than it has without borrowing?

so why didn’t chase bank create fountain pen money to cover their exposed behinds? kuchukua tu Youth fountain pen and stroke out 13b

This is part of the reason why some people want to return to gold in their reserves.

They already had created too much by lending out 16? billion. Remember a loan is in form of a number in an account. It is an asset that the bank expects that you will pay back because it is secure. An equal liability is made in form of a deposit on the banks account when your account is credited with the loan money. The bank is obligated to fill this liability hole as you payback the money. Once a loan is made, the bank is worth (loan lent to you + Interest)-(liability account for that loan). The only real addition to the bank’s assets in the long term is the (interest with inflation devaluation considered). If the loans are not secure as in the case of chase, the bank cannot pay its liabilities because the loans are not true assets that are guaranteed to be paid back.

Loans increase the money supply but does not directly increase the total amount of assets in a country. When you are given a loan, you have an asset in form of the loan money that you can spend, but you have a greater liability in form of a deficit+Interest that you have to fill in at the bank. That is how economic stimulation is done in form of loans.

It is ensured that you have loan as capital, but you cannot just pay it back without making a meaningful addition to the economy. You have to create the interest value.

The total amount of interest a population owes the banks/lenders including external has to be filled up by creation of new products with a value leading to economic growth.

In other words’ once I give you a loan, you procure an asset using a loan money, nothing has been added to the economy. You can even sell the asset and pay me back. But because you have to work harder to payback the interest, you have to create new products with a value. products are not necessarily goods.

The money supply has a built in debt that can never be repaid by the population. Its exists at any moment and it keeps the population working hard to fill it. That is why some people(the poor) will always be in the red.