How Clarence Thomas Effectively Denies His Race

The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down affirmative action in college admissions, declaring race cannot be a factor and forcing institutions of higher education to look for new ways to achieve diverse student bodies.

The court’s conservative majority effectively overturned cases reaching back 45 years in invalidating admissions plans at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, the nation’s oldest private and public colleges, respectively.

In 1971, Clarence Thomas was accepted into Yale Law School at a time when the school’s stated goal was for students of color to make up about 10% of its incoming class. In 1980, Thomas said at a meeting of Black conservatives, “You had to prove yourself every day because the presumption was that you were dumb and didn’t deserve to be there on merit.” Earlier today, Thomas was one of six Supreme Court justices to rule that colleges and universities can no longer take race into consideration as a specific basis for granting admission, reversing a decades-long precedent.

Thomas’s staunch opposition to affirmative action is examined within the larger context of his rise to power in “Clarence and Ginni Thomas: Politics, Power and the Supreme Court,” a documentary from GBH’s FRONTLINE | PBS. Stream the full two-hour film here: https://bit.ly/3XxMJkv

2 Likes

Uncle Tom in real life

1 Like

Thomas anajua chenye anafanya, contrast his position in Murica’s society to that of his fellow species?
The chap has wealth, influence and clout within the conservative circles, jamaa ni moto wa kuotea mbali in Red America.

1 Like

Clarence Thomas’s net worth is approximately $1 million .

Clarence Thomas is a United States judge. He has been an associate justice in the Supreme Court of the United States since 1991. He was appointed to the court by then-president George H.W. Bush. Clarence Thomas’s net worth is approximately $1 million.

Early Life

Clarence Thomas was born in Pin Point, Georgia, on June 23, 1948. He was the third child of M.C. Thomas and Leola Williams. His father abandoned the family when Thomas was only two years old. His mother was a domestic worker. She worked long hours but was mostly paid pennies per day.

When a fire brought down their home, Clarence Thomas’ mother remarried. The kids went to live with their maternal grandparents, Myers and Christine. Thomas and his brother, Myers Lee Thomas, had not had a decent meal until they went to their grandparents.

"In 1934, Dr.Kwame Nkrumah applied to Lincoln University for admission to study. One year passed and he had not received an offer or a response.

He then wrote an emergency letter to the Dean of Students at the University in 1935 reminding him of his request for admission to study at the university.

The university wrote back to him asking him to write a brief story of his life and his reasons for wanting to study at the school.

image

The following is the summary of what Nkrumah wrote to the university:

"I neither know where to begin nor where to

end because I feel the story of my life has not been one of my achievements.

Furthermore, I have not been anxious to tell people what may have been accomplished by me.

In truth, the burden of my life can be summarized into a single line in “The Memoriam,” quoted by Cecil Rhodes; “so much to do, so little done …”

In all things, I have held myself to but one ambition and that is to make the necessary arrangements to continue my education at a university".

The University awarded him admission and scholarship and, unlike “Uncle Thomas”, look at how much he achieved for his people.

Left: Justice Sonia Sotomayor; Center: Justice Clarence Thomas; Right: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson (image via Erin Schaff/pool/AFP via Getty Images)

The Supreme Court eradicated race-based affirmative action programs in college admissions Thursday when it ruled 6-3 that programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson slammed the Court’s decision as being “without any basis in law, history, logic, or justice,” and grounded instead in “let-them-eat-cake obliviousness.”

Likewise, Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the decision “not grounded in law or fact” and in conflict with “the vision of equality embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment.” She reduced the majority’s decision to an unwise move undertaken by unelected judges acting with willful blindness:

At bottom, the six unelected members of today’s majority upend the status quo based on their policy preferences about what race in America should be like, but is not, and their preferences for a veneer of colorblindness in a society where race has always mattered and continues to matter in fact and in law.

Chief Justice John Roberts penned the majority opinion.

“University programs must comply with strict scrutiny, they may never use race as a stereotype or negative, and — at some point — they must end,” he wrote. “Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it.”

Justice Clarence Thomas, who said during oral arguments that he had “no clue” what diversity because, in his words, “it seems to mean everything for everyone,” penned a lengthy concurrence that encapsulated the principle that race-based affirmative action is wrong because it is itself a form of racism that demands unequal treatment for those of different races.

Speaking directly to the three dissenting justices, Thomas acknowledged their sincere beliefs, but said “experts and elites have been wrong before — and they may prove to be wrong again.”

“The stakes are simply too high to gamble,” said Thomas. “Then, as now, the views that motivated Dred Scott and Plessy have not been confined to the past, and we must remain ever vigilant against all forms of racial discrimination.”

Jackson, the Supreme Court’s first Black woman justice, minced no words as she began with a check-in on the current state of systemic racism in the U.S.:

Gulf-sized race-based gaps exist with respect to the health, wealth, and well-being of American citizens. They were created in the distant past, but have indisputably been passed down to the present day through the generations. Every moment these gaps persist is a moment in which this great country falls short of actualizing one of its foundational principles—the “self-evident” truth that all of us are created equal.

In stark contrast to the chief justice’s proclamation that “Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it,” Jackson bluntly wrote: “Our country has never been colorblind.”

1 Like

Hata Kama wewe inngekua misungu unaeza deny such witty and humble request to join your institution?

2 Likes

Clarence Thomas in 1983: ‘God only knows where’ I would be if not for affirmative action

Thomas was an enthusiastic participant in the majority ruling from Chief Justice John Roberts invalidating race-based affirmative action programs this week. He has written various attacks on the practice in other opinions over the years, writing in 2013, “The worst forms of racial discrimination in this Nation have always been accompanied by straight-faced representations that discrimination helped minorities.”

He was saying something different in 1983, noted The Washington Post.

“Clarence Thomas told staffers at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that ‘God only knows where I would be today’ if not for the legal principles of equal employment opportunity measures such as affirmative action that are ‘critical to minorities and women in this society,’” wrote Timothy Bella. “‘These laws and their proper application are all that stand between the first 17 years of my life and the second 17 years,’ Thomas, then the EEOC chairman, said in 1983. His comments were later cited in outlets including The Washington Post, the New York Times and Newsweek.”

Conservative commentators have denied there was a reversal here, noted the article: “A 2022 opinion piece in the National Review argued that Thomas had praised ‘the proper application of the laws’ instead of affirmative action.”

Thomas, one of the most extreme right-wing members of the Court, has often been scrutinized for inconsistencies in the narrative about his life and background. He frequently attacked his own sister in remarks, claiming that she grew up dependent on welfare, but in the early 90s, investigative reporters found this was a gross misrepresentation.

Thomas has also come under fire recently amid reports that he accepted lavish travel and gifts from Harlan Crow, a Republican megadonor who had business before the Court, and did not disclose it.

He was the same judge who presided over the case of OJ Simpson who was unfairly acquitted after murdering his wife and her lover.

Who? :crazy_face:

Thomas alianzia chini kabisa hadi akafika apex, he was a beneficiary of his grandfather’s firm hand and work ethic. Thomas’ grandfather was his most influential role model. He ran several of his own businesses and instilled in Thomas a sense of discipline and strength. It’s a pity most of his species in Murica subscribe to the victim mentality ndo kwa maana wanaitanga yeye Uncle Tom. Justice Thomas does not do tokenism nor does he tolerate the victim mentality that afflicts most of his species, he strongly believes in pulling yourself by the bootstraps and has a real distaste for affirmative action, as hiring partners and other white colleagues would credit his accomplishments not to his hard work and dedication, but to the colour of his skin and the measures schools took to recruit black students.

That’s the history of all Blacks in America. Affirmative action helped all of them including Obama and Michelle.

The question is do you close the door behind you after you have been helped, or do you keep the door open for others behind you to enjoy the same opportunity?

Thomas, like you prefers to close the door and shut others out.

image

You can’t fight systemic racism this way. This will disproportionately affect those without the mettle and grit to fight for what they deserve. An unskilled and unemployed Black man won’t have the same fighting chance as an equally disadvantaged white guy in a system plagued with institutionalized racism.

1 Like

Tokenism cannot eradicate systemic racism, if anything it further aggravates the dependency syndrome his species have with the Democrats/administration. The best way to fight systemic racism is self-reliance and a willingness to go toe-toe with the oppressor. Going by the great man’s quote of “Two discriminatory wrongs cannot make a right,” It’s high time Black Muricans wean themselves off tokenism policies and instead fight for far reaching systemic reforms. Hii maneno ya kudanganyiliwa na mahindi kama kuku ikome.

1 Like

Historically and internationally, support for affirmative action has sought to achieve goals such as bridging inequalities in employment and pay, increasing access to education, promoting diversity, and redressing wrongs, harms, or hindrances .

The purpose of affirmative action is to establish fair access to employment opportunities to create a workforce that is an accurate reflection of the demographics of the qualified available workforce in the relevant job market.

In the context of higher education, affirmative action typically refers to admissions policies aimed at increasing the number of Black, Hispanic and other minority students on campus .
In summary, Affirmative action in the United States consists of government-mandated, government-approved, and voluntary private programs granting special consideration to historically excluded groups, specifically racial minorities or women . The programs tended to focus on access to education and employment.

This is also known as dependency syndrome, the problem with that is that you’ll never fully learn to stand on your own two feet, mbona blecs wamepitwa na Asians ambao hawajarushiwa mahindi na mtu? Watu wajivunie kujitegemea.

1 Like

Affirmative action benefits a few and only serves to foster a false sense of entitlement amongst the so called beneficiaries. I’d rather they tackle the real issues plaguing minority groups than hoodwinking them with token “affirmative action programs”.

1 Like