I fully support the court ruling because it prevents marriage entrepreneurship by both men and women, so I do not understand why women are against the ruling. Some FIDA women claim that women contribute in ways that cannot be monetized e.g baring children and raising them. I call this BS because men too contribute in ways that cannot be quantified. For example, it is the man who repairs broken items in the house, roofs etc, it is the man who provides security in that home so women should cut the crap of claiming that some of their contributions cannot be monetized. Dont forget that bills in most houses fall on the man, not the woman, it is hardly ever 50-50, more like 70-30. I believe the so-called contributions that cannot be quantified cancel out. She raises kids, you pay for their school fees, food, hospital bills etc so they should cut men some slack. I believe with equality and shit, you should get what you worked for. It applies to both women and men but only women seem offended by that ruling.
brownskin ulisemaje ile story ati mahomosexual wakuwe 80% ya population ?
Hata 90% ndio poa nikuwe Akuku Danger. Bado unatafuta porn ya 15 year olds dark web peadophile?
Kababa UMEBOMOA HII CLOSET NA RPG, yaani mahomo wakue 90% ndio upate rasa mingi saidi? Lightskin ulipenda tako sana
:D:D:D
Nitaanza na yako
Only a particular breed of women are bothered. Yes, say it with me…
The man supplies the sperm too.So without the sperm family is does not exist
surprisingly, it’s the women who mostly say “i don’t need a man in my life”, who are complaining…
Nappy seal bonoko lazima ukojolee thread?? Siku yenye utakamuliwa na FIDA bila lube ndio utajua hujui.