Do people remain faithful ama what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas
[MEDIA=twitter]1402370686103003146[/MEDIA]
He is a great man. I hope he doesn’t mind even if the kunguru decided to never come back to Kenya
I am looking but can’t find the difference between him and this dude over here bro… :D:D:D:D
[ATTACH=full]368663[/ATTACH]
Why hasn’t he divorced her yet?? Ama anangoja some crack hoe arudi from Denmark in 2032, broke as a joke, aanze kuitisha “matrimonial property”?? This is exactly how men get screwed in divorce court.
Broke as a joke and Denmark in the same sentence? Yenyewe hii kijiji people like talking about things they have no idea about.
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/DNK/denmark/poverty-rate
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/03/08/denmark-minimum-wage-mcdonalds-aoc/
Most probably she’s sacrificing her ikus for the sake of the familly…
The battering it must be receiving…
A moment of silence for the it.
Denmark people are highly taxed. This will subconsciously make the faithful wife to have a giving mentality and go give her punani to every tom dick and harry. These daughters of jezebel cant be trusted.
My mind is growing exponentially these days
You really think there are no drug addicts and broke people in Denmark or any other first world country :D…yenyewe hii kijiji imejaa bonoboz.
Hii jamaa jinga :D:D:D:D
She’s working. And “broke” in central and northern Europe is middle class in Kenya. The wife has been (presumably working) in Denmark at least 4 years. So she definitely qualifies for social welfare if anything goes wrong. I dunno how much it is in Denmark, but in Germany it’s 70 % of what you were earning before whatever it is happened that made you not work.
What are the chances she’s broke?
Poverty headcount ratio at $5.50 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $5.50 a day at 2011 international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions.
[ul]
[li]Denmark poverty rate for 2017 was 0.20%, a 0.2% decline from 2016.[/li][li]Denmark poverty rate for 2016 was 0.40%, a 0% increase from 2015.[/li][li]Denmark poverty rate for 2015 was 0.40%, a 0.3% decline from 2014.[/li][li]Denmark poverty rate for 2014 was 0.70%, a 0.1% increase from 2013.[/li][/ul]
Even the most hopeless people in Germany are entitled to a house plus utilities. And a minimum of at least 400 Euros a month Harz IV from the government. AND Denmark has a BETTER social welfare than Germany.
The only truly broke people in Central and Nothern Europe are those who are there illegally.
Denmark has like 0.0001% poverty level.
I’m not thinking. I lived in Europe for most of my early adulthood. Once you are employed and you work long enough to be entitled to the honey pot, you are not going broke any time soon.
I find no fault except for the fact that he still considers her a wife. he should have restructured with her out of the picture.
There’s a reason why the wife hasn’t moved him to Denmark. That guy should have filed for divorce 3 years ago. He will learn.
Like I said, stop yapping on things you don’t understand.
[SIZE=6]Hartz IV[/SIZE]
The fourth stage of the reform was voted in by the Bundestag on December 16, 2003 and by the Bundesrat on July 9, 2004, to take effect by January 1, 2005.
This part of the reforms brought together the former unemployment benefits for long-term unemployed (‘Arbeitslosenhilfe’) and the welfare benefits (‘Sozialhilfe’), leaving them both at approximately the lower level of the former Sozialhilfe (social assistance). The level for a single person was €374 per month (known as the Regelsatz). This risen since, reaching €391 per month in 2013.[1] Added to this is the financial assistance with housing and health care. Couples can receive benefits for each partner plus their children.
Prior to 2005, between 12 and 36 months (depending upon the claimant’s age and work history) of their full unemployment benefit (60 to 67% of the previous net salary) were followed by the Arbeitslosenhilfe (unemployment assistance), amounting to 53 to 57% of the last net salary. Since 2008, eligibility for the full unemployment benefit (renamed Arbeitslosengeld in 2005 and commonly referred to as Arbeitslosengeld I in everyday German to contrast it with the lower benefits discussed below) has been restricted to 12 months in general, 15 months for those aged 50 or older, 18 months for those 55 or older and 24 months for those 58 or older.
This is now followed by the (usually much lower) Arbeitslosengeld II (Hartz IV) benefits if the claimant meets eligibility requirements.
Whether or not a claimant is eligible for Arbeitslosengeld II depends on his or her savings, life insurance and the income of spouse or partner. If these assets are below a threshold level, a claimant can get money from the state. The threshold level in July 2008 was €150 for free assets (at least €3,100) and €250 for fixed retirement assets, both calculated per capita and lifetime year.[2] Additionally, every employable individual in a communal household (persons living in and depending on the resources of the claimant), can have one car worth about €7,500 and a self-used house of 130 square meters living space (more if there are other people in the common household).
To receive payments, a claimant must agree to a contract subject to public law. This contract outlines what they are obliged to do to improve their job situation, and when the state is obliged to help. An unemployed person may be required to accept any kind of legal job. This compulsion is restricted by constitutional rights, like freedom of movement, freedom of family, marriage and human dignity. If taking on a specific placement is deemed reasonable by the responsible agency, not applying will result in a reduction or even complete suspension of the appropriate payment.
Within the Arbeitslosengeld II schemes, the state covers the health insurance of the unemployed. Until the end of 2010, payments towards the pension scheme of the claimant were also made.
It is possible to earn income from a job and receive Arbeitslosengeld II benefits at the same time. Job income is debited from Arbeitslosengeld II payments according to a formula that leaves a certain amount of the additional revenue untouched. These revenues are: a certain amount of savings (which increases with age); €100 plus 20 percent of the wage up to €800 plus 10% of the wage up to €1200 (up to €1500 if there are children). Through this mechanism Arbeitslosengeld II can be regarded as a sort of minimum wage floor for employees without assets, where the minimum wage is not fully paid by the employer but assured by the state. There are criticisms that this defies competition and leads to a downward spiral in wages and the loss of full-time jobs.
The Hartz IV reform merged the federal level unemployment agency with the local level welfare administration. This facilitated a better, case-oriented approach to helping unemployed people find work and improve their situations. The plan’s objective is to reduce caseloads from 400 unemployed persons per agent to not more than 75 (aged 25 or less), or not more than 150 persons over the age of 25. For difficult cases, dedicated case managers may be deployed. Legally, however, the agencies remain separate.
The Hartz IV reforms continue to attract criticism in Germany, despite a considerable reduction in short- and long-term unemployment. This reduction has led to some claims of success for the Hartz reforms. Others say the actual unemployment figures are not comparable because many people work part-time or are not included in the statistics for other reasons, such as the number of children that live in Hartz IV households, which has risen to record numbers.
About 7 million people get Hartz IV benefits, of which 2.2 million are unemployed.[3] The budget is estimated to be 20 bn euro.[4]
The Hartz IV reforms formed one of the main foundations of Germany’s subsequent economic boom.[5]
In April 2018, 55% of the recipients had a migration background. According to the Federal Employment Agency (German: Bundesagentur für Arbeit) this was due to the migrants lacking either employable skills or knowledge of the language.[6]
In a November 2019 ruling the Federal Constitutional Court prohibited controversial harsh sanctions against benefit recipients. It outlawed complete payment cuts and decided that 30-percent cuts would only be permissible under specific conditions, as such punishments endangered jobseekers’ minimum standard of living.[7]
Yeah. And if the wife isn’t broke, then she has no reason to return here to a shithole country. So, its a lose-lose situation for the man because the “wife” will only return if she is broke and probably a crack addict. The fact remains that the guy should have divorced that woman a long time ago the moment she decided to abandon a 7-month old kid for her selfish monetary interests.
The only way they will ever re-unite is if the woman goes bankrupt in Europe and decides to come back home. The man has maximum downside and zero upside in this arrangement they call “marriage”.
I don’t take people who quote wikipedia seriously.
tumekubali facts , bt main issue here is… ikus inapeanwa haipeanwi ?
The only way they will ever re-unite is if the woman goes bankrupt in Europe and decides to come back home. The man has maximum downside and zero upside in this arrangement they call “marriage”. Best case scenario for him is that his wife lives a successful life abroad and never returns. Worst case, she comes back as a broke crack addict to ask for her share of “matrimonial property” because the man wasn’t smart enough to divorce her when she left. You don’t have to live in Europe to be able to use your head. It’s common sense. The nigga can only draw or lose in this situation.
A very easy and harmless way to let someone you dont want to spend time with go…you both win