I have read comments from jubilee sycophants and they keep making this assumption
if you have attended a economics class you would have come across non satiation principle
which simply states that if an investor has a choice between alternative investments, an
investor will always choose that with the largest expected
payoff.
uhuru is an investor no matter how you look at it he has to make money ,his kin are investors they want more and if he gets a chance to get more he would definitely take it.
NO MATTER HOW RICH ONE IS HE/SHE WOULD NEVER BE SATIATED.
What do you think UK meant when he lamented the scale of corruption in Kenya and expressed his frustration, saying that even organs supposed to combat the scourge were rotten too?
He has been brought up in thievery so stealing is all he knows so you cannot blame him.
The Maslow’s hierarchy of needs states that once that level is fulfilled the next level up is what motivates us but I think thos does not apply for African leaders.
In an economics class they teach you that investments are mean to bring cash profits what they don’t teach you is that there are other types of profits
where you come from also matters
Judas sold christ juu ya doo
Esau sold his birt right juu ya tumbo
Stephen the deacon was stoned …
the list is endless each one knows knows his/her place in life a thief remains a thief no matter what…