Somebody Explain This to Me Like a Two-Year Old, Pris

So the High Court ruled that the presidential ballot tender should be cancelled because there was no ‘public consultation’. Three questions:

  1. Was there public participation for the other five ballots?

  2. More importantly, does public procurement require public participation? So, when my client, The Youth Fund, wants to buy 300 reams of paper from my company, should we first have a public meeting at City Hall for people to express their views?

Q2…YES

yaliondwele zipi…sipite!!!

Which part do you want explained to you? It is as plain and simple as that.

There’s something seriously wrong with our Judiciary.
I’ve all along been wondering why one Sossion was really “fighting” hard for “teachers”…
kumbe alikuwa anataka kitunguu kinuke kwake.
The end game of these Judiciary guys will also become evident as time goes by!

Niaje Githaiga? Soon nitahitaji ku-pring another 10k posters,ArtPaper 135 utaniuzia aje?..

sossion has always been a raila die hard, the guy was doing raila’s bidding by prolonging the strikes

He is a sell out. Walimu wakaumia

When you have a family member who is a teacher then you’ll understand the plight of teachers and why they strike

Anyway hio mentality uko nayo ni ya village boy mwenye ako naive…ninge kubreakia vitu downn lakini najua hauwes elewa

Exactly how did he sell them out?..

@Mundu Mulosi wacha ujinga/upambavu :D:D. Nimeuliza swali very specific lakini you want to sound clever by beating about the bush.

Fact is, the presidential ballots were part of ONE tender that also included the printing of other ballots.

The logical consequence of cancelling one ballot is to imply all OTHERS are defective. Using those ballots then means that after the elections, losers will flood the courts saying they lost because the ballots were wrongly printed - there was no public participation.

yes teachers wako na shida, lakini sossion does not have teachers interests na hio ninajua because I know the man and am not saying this out of thin air

A simple action like placing the advert on our local dailies could qualify as public participation.

mzee i hope hii haitaonekana kama ku susulia ama ku-pupulia uzi wako…
lakini hawa watu wa naswa waliona ni kama hio ruling ilifanya washinde uchaguzi. so hio swali unauliza ni muhimu lakini hawaezi jibu

I think the filers of the suit were specific to the printing of presidential ballot papers. You know what they say that the law is an ass.

Ballot petition was aganist award of ballot printing for “presidential election” which is an exercise on its own Just that it lies withing the same date. For the other elections on 8/8 anyone is free to go to court and petition the award since there was no public participation either…But as per now, no one has filed and it will be assumed to have been awarded to algurair as per the public procurement act

You keep saying that, the issue is on the merit of the case. Kama hakukuwa na public participation kunafaa kuwe. And then again the case was against IEBC mbona Tumbilee wamecatch hivo ni kama hao ndio waneloose?

jibu maswali ya guka uwache sideshows…

  1. tender ya ku-print ballot papers ilikuwa moja ya zote ama seperate tenders kwa kila category?
  2. kama ilikuwa seperate sawa… kama haikuwa then tuseme hio koti ili play to the politricks za wanasiasa wenye walifile hio kesi

I already answered Kuga lakini pia akajifanya fala kama wewe, the ruling was plain and simple cancel that part of the tender to allow public participation. How is that to be explained hata kama wewe in Fala aje?

boss. wewe ni accountant kwa hivo most likely unaelewa procurement process sio kama mimi. so kama an expert kwa hio sector, ni possible ku cancel part moja ya tender ??