Shikwekwe. Kuja kidogo.

News & Politics
1

Shikwekwe the fake news have threatened to sue this P.S .

[SIZE=7]Peter Navarro releases 36-page report alleging election fraud ‘more than sufficient’ to swing victory to Trump[/SIZE]
By Andrew Mark Miller
December 17, 2020 - 1:40 PM

[SIZE=5]Get home delivery of the magazine. Subscribe today![/SIZE]

Director of the Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Peter Navarro published a lengthy report Thursday outlining several examples of voting irregularities that are “more than sufficient” to swing the outcome of the election in President Trump’s favor.
The 36-page report “assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states” and concludes that “patterns of election irregularities … are so consistent across the six battleground states that they suggest a coordinated strategy to, if not steal the election, strategically game the election process in such a way as to … unfairly tilt the playing field in favor of the Biden-Harris ticket.”

The six dimensions of voting irregularities in the report include: outright voter fraud, ballot mishandling, contestable process fouls, equal protection clause violations, voting machine irregularities, and significant statistical anomalies.
All six of those voting issues were present in at least two key states, according to the report, and a total of six battleground states experienced multiple examples of the other dimensions.
Story continues below
https://mediadc.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/603adde/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1246x702+0+0/resize/1246x702!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmediadc.brightspotcdn.com%2F4e%2F22%2F91af826e4e2bb3bf2f7715d1bfc8%2Fgraph-1.png
“Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage,” the report claims.

Additionally, the report cites affidavits alleging the exploitation of the elderly and the infirm by “effectively hijacking their identities and votes” and accuses Democrats of using the coronavirus pandemic to relax voter ID requirements to the point that ballot harvesting and fraud could slip by unnoticed.

The report outlined incidents in the key states of Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where ballots allegedly were illegally harvested and dumped into drop boxes.

The election was marred with examples of dead people voting, according to the report.

“In Pennsylvania, for example, a statistical analysis conducted by the Trump Campaign matching voter rolls to public obituaries found what appears to be over 8,000 confirmed dead voters successfully casting mail-in ballots,” the report claims. “In Georgia — underscoring the critical role any given category of election irregularities might play in determining the outcome — the estimated number of alleged deceased individuals casting votes almost exactly equals the Biden victory margin."

The report concludes: “The ballots in question because of the identified election irregularities are more than sufficient to swing the outcome in favor of President Trump should even a relatively small portion of these ballots be ruled illegal.”

Navarro, who worked on the report in a private capacity, is scheduled to hold a news conference at 1 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday to discuss the findings.

Trump has launched legal battles across the country since the November election, which has been called for President-elect Joe Biden by all major news networks and certified by the Electoral College, and as recently as this week stated that it’s “too soon to give up.”

Dozens of legal challenges across the country, however, have been lost, and the Supreme Court has declined to hear cases from both Texas and Pennsylvania challenging the election, which Trump’s supporters have decried as a politically motivated ducking.

Several Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, have broken with the president and conceded that Biden is the winner of the election. McConnell congratulated Biden on Wednesday, declaring that “the Electoral College has spoken.”

Additionally, Biden slammed claims of voter fraud this week, saying, “Thankfully, a unanimous Supreme Court immediately and completely rejected” efforts to overturn the election.

2

The judiciary is ducking Trump.

[SIZE=7]Mark Levin: Supreme Court ‘ducked’ on Pennsylvania election case and is ‘hiding under the proverbial table’[/SIZE]

By Andrew Mark Miller
December 9, 2020 - 10:54 AM

00:0901:59https://img.connatix.com/f047d67e-73cb-42c2-a990-6350de373aa9/1_th.jpg?crop=360:203,smart&width=360&height=203&format=jpeg&quality=60&fit=crop
Subscribe to get the latest Examiner videos

Conservative radio host Mark Levin slammed the Supreme Court’s decision not to take up a case challenging the election in Pennsylvania and accused the court of ducking and “hiding under the proverbial table” due to fear of political ramifications.

“This was a black-letter law case,” Levin said on his nationally syndicated radio show Tuesday night, following the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear a case challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s mail-in votes. “But I think the Supreme Court justices — now, I think they’re very fearful. I think they’re fearful the way Justice Owen Roberts became fearful after FDR tried to pack the Supreme Court. And then the Supreme Court would issue rulings 5-4, or 5-4, or 5-4 over and over again with Owen Roberts. Switching in support of FDR’s programs before that, they were knocking them down because FDR threatened to pack the court.”
Levin made the case that the court “knows full well” that there’s no way to stop the Democrats from packing the Supreme Court if they control the Senate and the White House and that the judges were influenced by that reality in this case.

“These justices sat in their conference room,” Levin said, "and had a long talk, not so much about the law in the Constitution but of our politics and the political ramifications of what would happen to their institution, which is now being threatened. And I think they made a terrible decision, and I think history will judge it that way.”
Levin said “all this court had to do early on” was to “follow Article II” of the Constitution.

“I think they’re scared to death,” added. “I think they’re very worried about what’s going to happen. I think they think we’re going to lose Georgia. I think they think Biden will be sworn in. And I think they think that any step they take to enforce the federal Constitution against a lawless Democrat Party, lawless state supreme courts and so forth, acting on behalf of the Biden campaign, acting on behalf of the Democrat Party, I think they think that will further instigate and motivate actions taken against the Supreme Court.”

“I think this court is hiding under the proverbial table,” Levin said to close out the segment.

Levin also discussed the ruling on Twitter, where he criticized a summary of the case written by former prosecutor Andy McCarthy.

“Rambling, incoherent, and projecting,” Levin tweeted along with an article written by McCarthy at the National Review. “The Court ducked. Has nothing to do with latches. Nothing to do with safe harbor. Nothing to do with ambiguity about the PA constitution. The Court issued a one sentence order without a word of explanation.”

Levin continued: “Unless it takes up the case when the petitioners file as a writ on the merits, it’ll be a disastrous precedent for decades to come. The Supreme Court acted with far less authority in Bush v. Gore in 2000. It’s that simple.”

[MEDIA=twitter]1336669753000292358[/MEDIA]

[MEDIA=twitter]1336669753830674435[/MEDIA]

3

Take it to court

4

The court is ducking the case. It is explained in that article.

And like I said, lawyers are lawyers. Walisoma pamoja.

Na juu mmeamua hii kitu nikuiba live live.

5

So what are your option

6

Where has he been?

7

[ATTACH=full]340081[/ATTACH]

You cried a lot about Obama appointed judges. Now go ahead and cry about Trump appointed judges and a Supreme court with a Republican majority :smiley:

8

[ATTACH=full]340084[/ATTACH]