ZHUKOVSKY, RUSSIA-Some military equipment rises to the level of celebrity—and in Russia, tanks immediately spring to mind. At a military exposition held over the weekend at Zhukovsky, a town just outside of Moscow, some lesser-known vehicles from the current Russian arsenal were on display. These trucks, missile launchers, communications systems and engineering vehicles are the real backbone of any modern land force. Land battles are a priority here, thanks to Russia’s impossibly long land borders. The country now upgrades Soviet designs and sells vehicles internationally for both financial and geopolitical gain. While the electronics and sensors are often a little outdated, it’s easy to admire the brute strength and rugged design of Russian military vehicles. Here are some of our favorites from the Engineering Technologies Forum in Zhukovsky, about 25 miles outside of Moscow.
A vehicle built for heavy engineering in tough environments, it’s hard not to respect this road-clearing (or -creating) monster. The two-man crew inside the vehicle can breach tree entanglements, blaze an 8-mile trail in an hour and lift 2 tons with a telescoping arm that extends 10 yards. It’s also prepared to survive a fight, with thick armor, masking smoke and a machine-gun turret. Best of all, it’s mounted on the chassis of a T-90 main battle tank. It can also survive blasts from explosives—the plow can clear pressure and magnetic-fuse mines—making the vehicle an all-purpose brute.
[SIZE=4]2) 9A52-4 MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM[/SIZE] http://pop.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/05/480x360/54caa8fa7d854_-_russian_vehicles_02_0710-lg-2282586.jpg
One hero of Russian history is the Katyusha, a wheeled vehicle from World War II that rained rockets on German troops and tanks. This modern version, a very lightweight rocket launcher mounted on a truck chassis, has a simple design but packs a wallop—the crew inside the cab fires 300-mm rockets with warheads that include incendiary, fuel-air explosive, cluster munitions or antitank mines. The one on display here features six reusable launch tubes, which can be reloaded by a separate vehicle, using a crane, within 8 minutes. While the four-axle truck it’s mounted on is not ideal off-road driving, these systems are masters of the shoot-and-scoot; by the time counterbattery fires rain down, they have driven away. This air-transportable version of the popular Smerch rocket system was introduced in 2007 but still awaits an international customer. (The previous, heavier versions are used by India, Algeria, Kuwait and others.)
[SIZE=4]3) KASTA 2E RADAR[/SIZE] http://pop.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/05/480x360/54caa8faba424_-_russian_vehicles_03_0710-lg-84831931.jpg
The Kasta is a great all-purpose radar system that can be used to track helicopters, cruise missiles and airplanes. Set this up for remote operation, and you’ve got a movable defense screen for virtually anything in the air or an air-traffic-control radar that can operate in any weather for up to 20 days. The radar here can cover about 90 miles, depending on the height of the antenna it is mounted on, and can be set up for action in 20 minutes. The Kasta is said to be resistant to enemy jamming. A newer version of this radar is a popular item on the international market and guards Iranian nuclear sites. The diesel engine fires up with a whine, and the old-school mechanical radar dishes spin, unlike newer electronic radar arrays.
There’s some truck Russia makes. Should be Tatra or something. That thing is ultra strong. Carries logs deep in the Siberian forests where mud and snow are in plenty.
[SIZE=4]5) 9A39 LAUNCH/RELOAD VEHICLE FOR THE BUK M1-2[/SIZE] http://pop.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/05/480x360/54caa8fb43b20_-_russian_vehicles_05_0710-lg-40998556.jpg
The BUK M1-2 Self-Propelled Launch System (called the SA-11 Gadfly by NATO) is tailor-made to spot and destroy aircraft and inbound cruise missiles. In this photo is an oft-forgotten part of the medium-range system—the reloader. The crane, bent in the front, hoists missiles onto nearby Gadflys. The system can’t see for itself—it relies on other nearby vehicles carrying radar for targeting—but it can shoot and reload on its own. The missiles are radar guided and can reach Mach 3. These vehicles are sold all over the world, including in Pakistan, Egypt, North Korea, Syria, China and (arriving soon) Venezuela.
[SIZE=4]6) MIK-MKS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM[/SIZE] http://pop.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/05/54caa8fb7c5b8_-_russian_vehicles_06_0710-lg-50637626.jpg
It takes a half-hour for the 100-foot mast of this vehicle to reach its full height. But once it does, the MIK-MKS provides wireless broadband access for 200 users using the four antennas atop the mast. Micran, the company that makes the system in the Siberian city of Tomsk, can tailor it for a variety of other communications uses, but the main purpose of the system is for a single vehicle to connect a slew of dispersed units. It’s designed to be hardened against jamming interference from enemies and rough conditions of Mother Nature, especially high winds.
[SIZE=4]7) PNEUMATIC DUMMIES[/SIZE] http://pop.h-cdn.co/assets/cm/15/05/480x360/54caa8fbc2408_-_russian_vehicles_07_0710-lg-54177166.jpg
Okay, these aren’t vehicles, but they’ve fooled us before. These cheap decoys made by Rusbal, a balloon manufacturer near Moscow, are intended to fool satellites and aircraft by adopting the shape, color, thermal signature (by using heaters) and radar returns of things that would make a juicy target for an airstrike. At the arms show, the company chose to inflate an S-300 antiaircraft missile launcher, the system that Iran is so eager to set up to thwart an Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities, if Russia will ever deliver them. Imagine they do so, with a crate of decoys thrown in. The company catalog includes aircraft, vehicles, hangars, radar arrays and forward operating bases. American military intelligence has been fooled by decoys before—notably by the Serbs, who protected their air force by setting up a fleet of faux targets. Nothing means tactical deception like launching a $600,000 cruise missile against a cheap balloon
That deception trick also worked on the nazis and imperial Japan. Sometimes I fantasise I’m the controller of the budget. People would go hungry and drive in potholes because I spent all the money on weapons and vehicles for KDF
Russian hardware is far, far superior to American hardware - it is simple and very hardy, which is why everybody is NOW using Russian rockets and re-entry vehicles to go to space. Even simple MIG-21s can score kills against F-15s in the right hands.
The problem was after the collapse of the USSR, Russian avionics started lagging behind. And avionics are everything in aerial warfare, not just the plane itself. Plus, American fighter pilots logged 50 times more hours, and as you know practice makes perfect (which is why, by the way, I laugh when people say the Ug airforce with their superior Sukhois, but whose pilots can’t even navigate around a mountain, can challenge KAF F-5 fighter pilots with 8,000 flight hours). In the last 10 years the Russians have caught up again, although they are still using some rust-buckets like SU-24 that was shot down by Turkey. Their modern jets and missile systems like the s-400 are however at par or superior to anything the West has, which is why nobody wants to fuck with Putin.
When Turkey shot down that rust-bucket for example, all Putin did was put a few cruisers armed with the S-400 in the Med with a warning that he could shot every damn F-15 and F-16 that took off in Turkey and challenged his planes, and the entire Turkish airforce was grounded! Just like that!
Russian hardware is far cheaper, and of equal if not better quality, has no strings attached, they only withhold a little technology to themselves unlike the west who withhold a lot. They can sell you what you want as long as the money is right and you don’t have to be high up in the pecking order of ass kissing in order to get the best. They can transfer technology with little hustling unlike the others. This is what I hope you mean by far, far superior.
Asande sana. Where were you when I was trying to educate some fool who was saying they would simply go to the maximum height possible and fire from there? The f-5 outnumber those flankers 4:1.
S-400 is excellent. At par, yes. Slightly better, yes. Superior, no.
You also forget it is not stealthy and can be shot down by SAMs. Missiles are not 100% accurate and for the F-5’s small size and supersonic speed, breaking radar lock is quite simple
