“If the phone was at the scene of crime, get the phone and charge it” ~cliff ombeta. :D:D:D:D
Hauko serious…i hope he didn’t say that.
@makamasi kama hauna kitu ya kusema apana sumbua sisi…tucker tucker
Nilisoma mahali ati alisema he represents Obado not Obado’s phone.
:D:D:D:D
jesus wept .
You gotta love these lawyers
Huyu anataka kukula pesa aende, what kind of ridiculous thinking is that?
if he did…that’s how lawyers start losing their clients’ cases—sideshows and trying to trivialize serious matters…
Some cases are very difficult to win, Obado alifanya hii case ikawa ngumu kwake.
The guy does have a point. How does the prosecution establish Obado’s presence by virtue of his phone? Maybe another actor was present with his phone? Hii ndio kwa maana Cliff amenukisha kitunguu hizi miaka zote na sisi hapa tunacheka kama keyboard warriors.
If the phone was with another person then Ombeta has to prove it. Prosecution can also say that Obado did not report the phone missing.
Bro, this guy said alikua Nai but his fon was at the murder scene. He had not reported it stolen, he had still been using the same fon even after the murder, and that fons records was in constant communication with the actual killers.
Furthermore, he is the baby-daddy of the kid, things had sored with sharon mpaka she was going to expose him through the journalist guy etc etc…
Then how does that prove Obado was behind the murder? Burden of proof ni ya prosecution brathe, thats why one is presumed innocent until otherwise.
The charge isn’t murder, it’s being an accessory to murder.
That still doesn’t prove anything. Hizi sheria zinakuwanga zimeandikwa na ufala mob sana. Even if he was present during the act, you cannot prove it by using his phone at the crime scene, communication between him and the others is what will put him in shit.
Imagine umewacha simu yako downstairs ukaenda upstairs kulala. Ukiamka unapata kuna mtu ameuliwa kwa mansion na hapo kwa crime scene ni simu yako. Infact alikuwa strangled na cable yake ya kucharge. Kina @pamba wanakuja na kusika wewe na unakula maharagwe pale industrial area kidogo. Its on the prosecution to prove that you did it and even if that wasn’t the charge, and they had you for accessory to murder, your phone being there or your cable being used is not sufficient. However, if the hitman can finger you or if communication exists between the two of you and there is both MENS REA and ACTUS REUS then and only then is your goose cooked. Hawa watu kama Cliff wamesoma sana na wanajua what they are doing.
That’s a poor example. Kwani hujakuwa ukisoma news? The taxi driver admitted he was there and he saw who did what and when and who ordered him. That alone is enough, the phone just corroborates it.
My point exactly. Its the WITNESS and not the PHONE. Hizo ni vita mbili tofauti sana jameni.
He’s not a witness per se. He’s also charged and agreed to plead guilty for a lesser 14 yr sentence.