I watched the video till the end. The presenter should get his facts right after minute 16. He falsely states that the pathologist concluded that none of the wounds were consistent with a car accident. The truth is that the pathologist stated categorically that a broken limb, broken jaw and cerebral clot were all somewhat consistent with automobile trauma.
The only wound not consistent with automobile trauma was a deep incision wound between the thumb and index finger. In view of reports that he was attacked by knife wielding chokora, such a wound would be consistent with the late Ken holding the sharp edge of the knife in self defense.
Let us mourn a great fellow without indulging in too much conspiracy theory