[ATTACH=full]165703[/ATTACH]
The stats are total BS. But what a creative way to nukisha kitunguu… three green emojis
Guy is a genius in selling his idea. Compare the approach to mharo’s click-baits.
I have never understood why the consent of the woman is required for the man to do a DNA test on “his” kids.
I think it is only required for the DNA to be admissible in court. You can do a dry run secretly then go confidently for the court sanctioned process
That’s my point most I have heard are from the courts and most of the time the women decline and nothing can be done.
strange, how now? I can bet if a man contests parentage as the basis of his refusal to pay child support the court will force a DNA test.
Bro you will be amused by the ruling in the family division… It’s assumed that the fact you have been living with the woman for a period, you have taken up the parental rights even if you are not sure of the paternity of the kids. I think it’s called emotional distress of the minors or something. You will be amazed.
damn! OK good to know bro. Was ignorant of that fact. The law is an ass
Indeed the law is an ass!
On the same boat. I have been seeing a pointer to the same about Canada and France and told my self those are western man’s problems…MGTOW seems to be the only way out.
In that case it is therefore advisable to take a DNA test immediately the child is born, before maintaining the child. Especially when you suspect the kid is not yours.
[ATTACH=full]165724[/ATTACH]Section 25 of the Children Act
Most men don’t… Ati unapenda khubibi… I believe the first birth you ask for the DNA, and from that point you are protected by the law.
Wewe ndio umepata mahali wanaume hushikwa koo.
Are they somehow suggesting that they can even falsify the results?
This section 25 relates to people who are not married. That is how I understand this section
Wah!!!
This is scary, Man!
:D:D:D :D:D:D :D:D:D