Nature vs Nurture:

Are black people overrepresented in sports? Maybe, just maybe blacks are better machines.

Sports are a pure meritocracy. In fact, any type of corruption and obstruction yields bad results. A rational coach will always pick the best players regardless of their color or any of that shiett.

France won the world cup with a black squad.

White people hate negroes in their country until its time to play international sports.

How many black people VS white people are In the world cup? The whites outnumber them by far

@Jimi

ii thread hagwes toa

:smiley:

What about the NBA? etc

Of course it’s evident every Olympics or football or basketball or rugby or boxing tourney. Blacks have the most fine tuned bodies on the planet ni nature Tu tuseme. Hawa races zingine ni weaklings Sana especially Asians followed by Western whites. Ama ni foods Hafifu wanakula zinawageuza wamama

Na bado mlikuwa enslaved and colonised by musungu, muarabu na Asians.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STbswoew30c

I am no genetic expert, but I do recall a conversation that whites and asians are genetically weaker because they interbred with Neanderthals when they migrated from Africa 50,000 years ago.

Neanderthals were physically superior to modern humans, almost like a human chimp.

They are extinct. Which infers they were genetically inferior to sapiens.

There is nothing like genetically weaker. Organisms simply do whatever enables gene replication in their environment

They weren’t genetically inferior. They were just socially unsophisticated. Kind of like having a race of loners with little social hierarchies. They couldn’t form complex societies with politics, justice, religion, language, etc or if they could, they didn’t transmit very well within their race.

Sorry for the large font sections. I simply googled and copy pasted the first few articles. Call it what you want, it’s all semantics.

White Americans are both genetically weaker and less diverse than their black compatriots, a Cornell University-led study finds.
Analyzing the genetic makeup of 20 Americans of European ancestry and 15 African-Americans, researchers found that the former showed much less variation among 10,000 tested genes than did the latter, which was expected.
They also found that Europeans had many more possibly harmful mutations than did African, which was a surprise.
Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds

[SIZE=7]Evolution Says You’re Weaker and More Disease Prone Than Your Ancestors[/SIZE]
Scientist says humans are evolving desirable personalities while sacrificing survival traits
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/05/01/evolution-says-youre-weaker-and-more-disease-prone-than-your-ancestors

Men have more physical strength, but are women actually genetically hardwired to be tougher, thanks to their XX chromosomes? You bet, says a new theory
Why women have a genetic advantage over men

[SIZE=7]Africans and Europeans have genetically different immune systems… and Neanderthals had something to do with it[/SIZE]
Africans and Europeans have genetically different immune systems... and Neanderthals had something to do with it | Institut Pasteur

More susceptible to disease. Very important do not skip.
Modern humans with Neanderthal genes carry this to date. Researchers say they are more susceptible to for example Covid.

ukweli but focus on physic.

Well you could argue that all isolated organisms are prone to foreign diseases in this case those introduced by migrating humans so I don’t see how that’s relevant.

My point is that Whites and Asians are genetically weaker than Africans because they interbred with neanderthals who were genetically weaker than sapiens. That they are more prone to disease due to this interbreeding is very relevant to that point and very relevant to why sapiens outlived neanderthals.

You could also argue that that’s even less relevant because inspite of their predisposition to diseases, maybe even because of it, they have managed to thrive more, both technologically and socially than we have. However, your premise about genetic weakness is shaky and can’t be relied upon to make your conclusion. If we all lived on the same continent in the same climate maybe you could make a case about that weakness.

I didn’t make the premise, researchers from Cornell University did.
I’ve not made a comment on their technological and social advancement. I do not see how that ties in with the argument that they are genetically weaker due to interbreeding with neanderthals that introduced weak genes to their genetic make up. I could see how it ties in with climate as Dr. James Watson once made that argument. That whites are intellectually superior to blacks because they had to adapt to a more challenging climate but that’s a different argument altogether.

The way you use the premise is problematic. For instance why aren’t whites prone to HIV and malaria? Why are there more Asians than Africans despite said weakness? And before you say anything consider a huge part of India and southern Asia where most countries have more than 100 million people has a similar climate to Sub-Saharan africa.