Mexico Retaliates

MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexico hit back fast on U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum on Thursday, targeting products from congressional districts that President Donald Trump’s Republican party is fighting to retain in November elections.

Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo said the tit-for-tat measures would complicate talks between the United States, Canada and Mexico to revamp the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) that underpins trade between the neighbors.

The spat meant it would be “very difficult” to reach a deal to revamp NAFTA before Mexico’s July 1 presidential election, though he underlined the continent had not entered a trade war.

“A trade war is when there is an escalation of conflict. In this case, it is simply a response to a first action,” Guajardo told Mexican radio. “We should stick to the clearly defined battlefield, where the response is appropriate and proportional.”

Mexico’s retaliatory tariffs target pork legs, apples, grapes and cheeses as well as steel - products from U.S. heartland states that supported Trump in the 2016 election.
The country reacted right after Washington said in the morning it was moving ahead with tariffs on aluminum and steel imports from Canada, Mexico and the European Union.

“It sends a clear message that this kind of thing does not benefit anybody,” Guajardo said of the Mexican retaliation.
“Because, in the end, the effect will fall on voters and citizens that live in districts where the people have a voice and vote in the (U.S.) Congress.”

Mexico said it was imposing “equivalent” tariffs, ratcheting up tensions during talks to renegotiate NAFTA ahead of the U.S. mid-term elections in November. The measures will be in place until the U.S. government drops its tariffs, Mexico’s government said.

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5b10859f1a0000c704ce0429.jpeg?ops=scalefit_630_noupscale
HENRY ROMERO / REUTERS
Mexico’s Economy Minister Ildefonso Guajardo said the country’s retaliatory measures “sends a clear message that this kind of thing does not benefit anybody.”

MEXICO WITH THE WORLD

Guajardo said retaliation was aimed at products chosen to hit districts with important lawmakers who had been warning Trump not to mess with Mexico. He estimated the U.S. tariffs would affect $4 billion in trade between the two countries.
“It is a sad day for international trade,” Guajardo said. “But hey, the decision was made, and we always said that we were going to be ready to react.”

In 2011, Mexico successfully used a similar list of mostly agricultural products to push Washington into letting Mexican truckers on U.S. highways.

Trump’s Republicans are fighting to retain control of Congress in mid-term elections. Their majority in the House of Representatives is seen as vulnerable.
Pork exporter Iowa, where incumbent Republican Rod Blum faces a Democratic challenge, is an example of a place Mexico’s reaction could hurt.

Mexico buys more steel and aluminum from the United States than it sells. It is the top buyer of U.S. aluminum and the second-biggest buyer of U.S. steel, Guajardo’s ministry said.

The countermeasures will hit U.S. hot and cold rolled steel, plated steel and tubes, the ministry said.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto spoke by phone after the U.S. announcement. Canada pledged to fight back with its own measures.
Trump threatened to rip up the NAFTA deal during his election campaign but agreed to renegotiate early in his term. Still, since talks began nine months ago, he has repeatedly said he could walk away from NAFTA if it is not redone to his liking.

“The difference between a year and four, five months ago is that it seems the world looked and said ’poor Mexico,” Guajardo said. “Now, Mexico is facing these threats together with the world.”

Mexico iko na mchezo sana.

Don’t they realise they are living just south of “freedom & democracy?” Watawesa kweli??? :smiley:

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--LNC1IQopPg/UwywZ4Pqj_I/AAAAAAAADcA/6dyECKdIDxE/s1600/sceneggiature+e+sceneggiate.jpg
Hizi ubodi wawachie the big boys i.e. China, Russia, India, etc

Mboga hapo haitoshi.

i like that very much. every ndamathia has a soft underbelly…
Muchina naye ali-target soya bean na pork.

Drumpf thinks that he can dictate to PARTNERS. Now he’s at war with China, EU, Canada and Mexico, and they know where to hit back hard!

[SIZE=7][B]US tariffs a dangerous game, says EU[/B][/SIZE]

The EU has issued a 10-page list of tariffs on US goods ranging from Harley-Davidson motorcycles to bourbon.
Canada and Mexico are also planning retaliatory moves against the tariffs.
Ms Malmstrom said the EU would challenge the move at the World Trade Organization (WTO) but that tariffs on US imports were necessary as “we cannot just take these tariffs and stay silent”.
The commissioner said that despite the EU’s “rebalancing” action, the two sides were not in a trade war.
“What we are in is a very difficult situation,” Ms Malmstrom said. This situation could only be diffused by the US withdrawing its measures against the EU, she added.

Umepotea sana after handshake, I presume you’re nursing your wounds. Ugua polepole

Empires eventually self-destroy with schemes of their own making.

He forgot that principle of reciprocity is core in IR.

US of A is picking economic fights with anyone they can but I dont think they will win. Their wages are too high, making it impossible for them to manufacture or produce anything than the rest of the world. The result is obvious. Countries with the technology and lower wage bills will produce goods cheaper and sell them to the US. The average American is still rational and will buy the cheaper product. These are the kicks of a dying economic super power. They must experience a period wage bill mean reversion to compete successfully in a free market. When their wages approach the global mean, they will start to compete effectively again.

Pia Rwanda wameamua kwao sio dumpsite ya mtuumba. Murica wakule ujeuro wao

Hii kitu inaumiza watu bana.

Steel manufacturers are hurting elsewhere because US is a big market. Protectionism effects are not felt immediately. Those guys in the trump belt will suffer in the long run.

[ATTACH=full]173651[/ATTACH]
Ukiongeza proximity factor, they actually do have enough power to fight back on some things.

The two countries need each other more than they are willing to admit.

You’re right boss. I was just being sarcastic.

According to Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC), the following will be the largest economies in the world in 2050.

From a strategic point of view, this is what is giving the Americans sleepless nights.

The Washington beltway has very smart strategic thinkers and unlike the likes of @patco they take such reports very seriously indeed.

[ATTACH=full]173658[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=full]173656[/ATTACH]

Wacha zako. Devoid of your personal situation, can you tell us exactly which Drumpf effort awoke the recruiters and gave them your #? If you’ve studied economics, you know fiscal policies take years to be felt by the common laborer. Hence, actions taken by Drumpf will be felt 4 5 years down the line. What you’re experiencing now is courtesy of the former “alien” President. The downfall from Drumpnomics will be brutal given that the US is forcing other countries to develop their capacity and be less reliant on the US. I can bet you the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese are today figuring out how to make their own computer chips (after watching Drumpf toy around with ZTE). Once they produce their own (faster & better), Qualcomm and Co. lose that business for good. What happens then? Even those recruiters will be out of jobs.

China will be the no.1 economy.
The average Chinese will still be earning a quarter of what the average American earns.

China has an economy built on a saving culture while most Western countries are consumer economies. Therefore China has better prospects for growth.

[ATTACH=full]173679[/ATTACH]

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2015/10/25/china-savings-rate-versus-the-world-in-a-chart.html

A savings culture of 40%.
If your income us a quarter of the US income,then you are saving less than 10% of the average American per capita income.
The thing is,savings culture or not, the savings are meager because Chinese per capita will forever remain low in comparison to other developed nations, in this century at least.
Heck,it is barely five years since China overtook South Africa in per capita income and China is not growing the way they usee to.

sasa wewe unatuambia nini wewe?! 11% of Mexican population emigrated to the U.S. since the 1960s due to poverty!

11% of a whole country…

Hata siongezi kitu ingine.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaand…he’s back! Niaje msee?

Kojolea thread kabisa. The floor is yours mate :D:D:D