@Lucern kwomu hivi kiasi.

@Lucern since unapenda media sana soma hio hapo chini. Summary ni hivi Trump haendi mahali hadi 2020. To impeach the man the Democrats have to retain their 26 seats up for grabs in the senate na waongoze an extra two votes to get a majority ndio waanze impeachment process. Then they have to convice 17 Republican to rebel and kick trump out by voting with them. An insane task. They were hoping last year that maybe… just maybe the Republicans would revolt against Trump but imekuwa ngumu. In klist there was a hyena that followed the Jubilee hands hoping just hoping…

So the only hope for democrats is that Trump fucks up the economy phenomenally, since he is not invading any country out there at the moment… na pia watafute another inspirational Obama who can take down Mr. Trump in 2020 na hawana! And Obama had a Bush failure to be compared to… any democrat would have beaten the republican candidate in 2008. RED WAVE HADI 2024!! Mtaongea mingi hadi mchoke.

[SIZE=7]Political storm around Trump leads to ‘talk of impeachment’ — but it’s not likely[/SIZE]
[ul]
[li]After the conviction of Paul Manafort and guilty plea of Michael Cohen, questions are being asked whether President Trump could now be impeached.[/li][li]Experts say this is unlikely, given the GOP control of Congress and the November midterm elections looming.[/li][/ul]
Holly Ellyatt | @HollyEllyatt
Published 18 Hours Ago Updated 15 Hours AgoCNBC.com

PLAY VIDEO

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/08/22/105409826-4ED3-SBEU-082118-PeterTrubowitz.530x298.jpg?v=1534926703
As the world wakes up to the political storm unfolding in the U.S. around some ofDonald Trump’s closest former associates, questions are being asked whether the president could now be impeached — although that scenario appears unlikely.
The political firestorm reached new heights Tuesday with Trump’s former campaign chief, Paul Manafort, and his former lawyerMichael Cohen appearing in separate courts. Manafort was convicted by a jury and Cohen pleaded guilty to separate felony charges.
“Together, what these things are going do is that they’re going to fuel talk of impeachment,” Peter Trubowitz, head of international relations at the London School of Economics, told CNBC on Wednesday, calling it a “double whammy” of the Manafort and Cohen outcomes.

“Mr. Trump had a pretty bad day yesterday, and it’s really hard to know what’s worse here, the indictment of his former election campaign chairman Paul Manafort, or the plea bargain by Michael Cohen, the president’s former personal lawyer for violating campaign finance laws,” Trubowitz told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”
https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/07/26/105356300-1532629376632rtx6cxe9.530x298.jpg?v=1532629464
Joshua Roberts | Reuters
President Donald Trump waves from his vehicle as he prepares to depart for Dubuque, Iowa, from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, July 26, 2018.
In New York on Tuesday, Cohen pleaded guilty in a federal court to eight felony counts of tax fraud, bank fraud and campaign finance violations.
Potentially the most damaging counts that Cohen pleaded guilty to appeared to implicate Trump directly when he admitted to making payments to two women at the direction of an unidentified candidate for political office, who appeared to be the president. Those payments, Cohen said, were made to influence the outcome of the election.
Separately on Tuesday, a jury found Manafort guilty of eight felonies unrelated to the 2016 election: five counts of felony tax fraud, one count of failing to report a foreign bank account and two counts of bank fraud. Manafort’s conviction was for charges unrelated to the 2016 campaign.
Reacting to the news as he arrived at a campaign rally at West Virginia on Tuesday, Trump expressed sympathy for both of his former aides, saying “I feel badly for both. I must tell you that Paul Manafort is a good man,” according to a White House transcript.
[URL=‘https://buffett.cnbc.com/video/2017/05/08/buffett-you-do-not-want-to-give-jeff-bezos-a-seven-year-head-start.html?__source=BXmobile|IA|keywordcore|Clip’]“You do not want to give Jeff Bezos a seven-year head start.”
Hear what else
Buffett has to say
https://assets.bounceexchange.com/assets/uploads/clients/1021/creatives/4891f574b9003f2d6ea4965ff039239f.svg[/URL]
Trump yet again called special counselRobert Mueller’s ongoing investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election a “witch hunt.” Trump and the Kremlin deny allegations of collusion to influence the 2016 election outcome.
Nonetheless, Trubowitz said the developments represented a victory for Mueller.
“It’s going to make it harder for Republicans in Congress to call for an end to his investigation. He’s (Mueller) now got something he can show for his efforts,” Trubowitz said.
“The second (trial), the plea bargain (by Michael Cohen), makes it harder — even though Mr. Trump was doing this yesterday in West Virginia — for him to insist that this is all a witch hunt, because Cohen pleaded guilty to charges stemming from a grand jury investigation led by the U.S. attorney’s office and southern district of New York, i.e. not from Mr. Mueller,” Trubowitz added.
The White House did not immediately respond when CNBC requested comment on this story.
Impeachment?
With Cohen facing up to five years in prison, questions are being raised as to whether Trump could also be prosecuted. Cohen’s lawyer Lanny Davis said Tuesday after the proceedings, “If those payments (of hush money) were a crime for Michael Cohen, then why wouldn’t they be a crime for Donald Trump?”
Despite impeachment talk, it’s no easy task to remove a president in such a way. Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson were impeached, but both were acquitted by the Senate. President Richard Nixon resigned before a likely impeachment.
There are three impeachable offenses: treason, bribery and the more opaque “high crimes and misdemeanors,” but the House of Representatives has the responsibility to accuse the president of one of those things. If a majority in the House agrees, a president is then impeached. The Senate then votes on impeachment, which under the U.S. Constitution requires a two-thirds majority.
In Trump’s case, starting the impeachment process would require a mass revolt by Republicans against him in the GOP-controlled House, an event even less likely than normal with midterm elections coming in November.
Even Democrats are mostly keeping quiet about impeachment to avoid motivating the Republican base before the elections.Public opinion polls have also shown a general unease among the American public when asked if they would like to see Trump impeached should the Democrats win control of the House.
https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/08/21/105409080-1534888210178cohen.530x298.jpg?v=1534888428
Mark Kauzlarich | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Michael Cohen, former personal lawyer to U.S. President Donald Trump, exits from federal court in New York, U.S., on Tuesday, Aug. 21, 2018.

Jacob Parakilas, the deputy head of the U.S. and Americas program at the think tank Chatham House in London, told CNBC that the political implications of the Manafort and Cohen proceedings were not clear cut.
“It’s fair to say that any day that sees close associates of the sitting president convicted and pleading guilty to numerous crimes … is not a great day for the Republican Party. Yet that said, the (midterms) are still a few months away, and the news cycle these days is so incredibly rapid that if these things don’t develop further, it’s possible they’ll be consumed into a bigger narrative that may or may not favor the Democrats,” he said.
“But I don’t think this is the last we’re hearing of either Manafort or Cohen, I don’t think this is the end of their sagas.”
PLAY VIDEO

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/08/22/105409838-4ED3-SBEU-082118-JacobParakilas.530x298.jpg?v=1534928427
Richard Johnson, a professor in U.S. politics at Lancaster University, also remarked that he would “urge caution to those who think impeachment is around the corner.”
“Impeachment is a political process. The jury is 100 U.S. senators, whose overwhelming concern is re-election and, even more pertinently for some, re-nomination. Two-thirds of them must vote to convict. We’re in a new partisan landscape from the 1970s. Even if Democrats take control of the House, will there be around 17 Republican senators willing to vote with around 50 Democrats to convict a Republican president? I doubt it,” he said in a research note.

More painful truths. Trump has the powers to pardon them all. Mueller is just writing a beautiful report.

WASHINGTON SECRETS
[SIZE=7]Law Prof: Trump can pre-pardon all in Russia probe, kill Mueller’s inquest[/SIZE]
by Paul Bedard
| June 03, 2018 08:03 AM
Print this article
https://mediadc.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/1f140dd/2147483647/strip/true/crop/4910x3274+0+0/resize/4910x3274!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmediadc.brightspotcdn.com%2Ff9%2F0a%2F33a500724b1e8c4380703f60365d%2Fap-18152653058994.jpgPresident Donald Trump walks through an honor guard as he arrives to attend a Change of Command ceremony at the U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Friday, June 1, 2018, in Washington. Adm. Paul Zukunft will be relieved by Adm. Karl Schultz as the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Jacquelyn Martin/AP
President Trump is not only right in claiming he can’t be subpoened in special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, but he can also issue a blanket pardon to any targeted in the probe, a move that would essentially shut it down, according to a top legal expert.
By offering a pre-pardon, Trump could signal to potential “flippers” that they won’t have to go to jail for refusing to testify against the president or his 2016 presidential campaign.
According to George Washington University Law School Professor John F. Banzhaf, the president has several ways to thwart Mueller, including a move “to directly or indirectly assure those under investigation that they will be pardoned if they don’t agree to be flipped by Mueller. Going a step further, since there seems to be clear precedent for such presidential action, would be for Trump to issue blanket all-crimes pardons to anyone under possible investigation.”

[URL=‘https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/law-prof-trump-can-pre-pardon-all-in-russia-probe-kill-muellers-inquest’]

Who is Paul Manafort and what’s going on with him?[/URL]
Watch Full Screen to Skip Ads

His analysis followed the leak of a Trump team memo to Mueller that questioned whether Trump could be taken to court.
Banzhaf said that the Constitution suggests only the impeachment process can take Trump down, not a prosecutor.

He suggested that Trump’s recent pardon’s of those who claim they were politically prosecuted was a signal to those being questioned by Mueller that they can stay quiet and not face jail.
“Indeed, some commentators have suggested that Trump’s earlier decisions to pardon Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby and Sheriff Joe Arpaio, his more recent decision to pardon Dinesh D’Souza, and his statement that he might pardon Martha Stewart and Rod Blagojevich,were meant, at least in part, to signal to those being pressured to ‘flip’ that he is likely to remove the prosecutor’s threats by being willing to issue pardons to them,” according to Banzhaf.
He added, “by these actions, Trump is reassuring those who may be under investigation by Mueller that they need not bow to threats of prosecution, and reveal sensitive information to investigators, because a similar pardon will protect all those who remain loyal to the president.”
He cited some relevant examples and even noted an analysis that Hillary Rodham Clinton, if she became president, could pardon herself in the email scandal.
“It seems clear that a full and absolute pardon can be issued, even without naming any of the crimes which might have been committed, or waiting until formal charges are brought or even sought. As the Supreme Court has said, the pardon power ‘may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken, or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment,’” the law professor said.

And yesterday Lawyer Cohen said hajiskii na pardon which is okay. But I still maintain that maybe Cohen is still in cahoots with Trump. To convince Mueller that you are giving him gold when it’s actually crap, you must play the part of a lawyer who has finally found salvation! A complete paradox.

[SIZE=7]Michael Cohen would not accept and does not want a pardon from President Trump, lawyer Lanny Davis says[/SIZE]
[ul]
[li]Lanny Davis, attorney for ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, says his client would not accept a pardon from President Trump.[/li][li]He says Cohen “considers a pardon from somebody who has acted so corruptly as president to be something he would never expect.”[/li][li]Cohen pleaded guilty in federal court Tuesday to eight felony counts of tax fraud, bank fraud and campaign finance violations.[/li][/ul]
Matthew J. Belvedere | @Matt_Belvedere
Published 16 Hours Ago Updated 15 Hours AgoCNBC.com
PLAY VIDEO

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2018/08/22/105410323-GettyImages-1020911958.530x298.jpg?v=1534943830
Lanny Davis, attorney for ex-Trump lawyerMichael Cohen, said Wednesday his client would not accept a pardon from PresidentDonald Trump if one were ever offered.
“Not only is he not hoping for it, he would not accept a pardon. He considers a pardon from somebody who has acted so corruptly as president to be something he would never expect,” Davis said in an interview on NBC’s “TODAY.”
The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on Davis’ remarks.

Davis also said Cohen is willing to share information with special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russia’s attack on the 2016 campaign and any potential conspiracy between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign to sway the election.
Cohen “is more than happy to tell the special counsel all that he knows, not just about the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude and corrupt the American Democracy system in the 2016 election, … but also knowledge about the computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on,” Davis told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.
Comments from Davis, who served in the White House under President Bill Clintonand remains close to the Clinton family, came after Cohen pleaded guilty in federal court in New York on Tuesday to eight felony counts of tax fraud, bank fraud and campaign finance violations.
The U.S. Attorney’s office said Cohen pleaded guilty for facilitating payments to prevent two women from discussing their “alleged affairs with a presidential candidate, thereby intending to influence the 2016 presidential election.”
Mueller, as part of his election meddling probe, had referred the Cohen case to federal prosecutors in Manhattan.
Cohen’s plea came as a federal jury in Alexandria, Virginia, convicted former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manaforton eight counts of fraud and other charges.
“I feel very badly for Paul Manafort,” Trump said Tuesday after landing in West Virginia for a campaign rally. But he added the conviction “doesn’t involve me” and has “nothing to do with Russian collusion.”
The president did not comment on Cohen’s plea deal, and did not mention either Cohen or Manafort during his speech at the rally Tuesday night.
Trump broke his silence on Cohen on Wednesday morning, however.
“If anyone is looking for a good lawyer,” the president tweeted, “I would strongly suggest that you don’t retain the services of Michael Cohen!”

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2013/03/05/100523312-Matt-Belvedere.60x60.jpg?v=1529981765
Matthew J. BelvedereSenior Editor

Hekaya za Abunwasi everywhere. How about cost of living in Kenya, Bobby Wine pale next door na kuzuia Baba Abby?

unaitwa lucern kwanza? Si uende uanzishe thread za hao umetaja. Simu uko nayo, credit uko nayo, handle uko nayo. Topic uko nayo. Ni kii?!

Don’t underrate those wazunyes, they’ve started calling out trumps collusion. Cohen I heard was getting 65yrs behind bars but after pleading to implicate trump anapewa 45yrs. That’s some serious sentencing. Trump is going, just a matter of time and he knows it.

If Trump knew he was going hata hangengoja he would have pulled a Nixon mapema in 2017 and just quit. The threat was a full on republican revolt early in his presidency. Akina McCain were sending hints.

This is a simple case where the democrats lost but they want to say that they lost ALL BECAUSE of Russian meddling. That’s the tune. Similar to when Raila says he lost all because the other side stole. The guy didn’t campaign well, he practically kept repeating what Gathecha said, free high school, free this, free that, almost endorsing the Jubilee thugs. Then you hold the country at ransom at the IEBC ati it is solely their fault!

The Democrats have put all their eggs on Mueller’s shoulders. And what’s the point? Trump has already ruled Madame Clinton. The worst has already happened. Ameshaongoza.

And he is doing a somewhat good job. Ashaongoza you can’t rewind the years. By the time they even consider impeachment it will be mid 2019 and the election is the following year. Na hakuna nusu mkate U.S.!

Hata Gore alikubali shingo upande. Look ahead at 2020. And truth be told the Democrats are no angels themselves as they are trying to market themselves here.

i dont think unaelewa,if russians meddled which is being proven slowly by mueller do u know what that means?that the worlds superpower elections were manipulated by russia an enemy ?thats terrorism my friend .nothing to do with politics ,its the law .i was supporting trump btw during the elections coz i dint want clinton to win but to be honest trump is proving to be a dirty candidate and thats not good.

Cohen is doing 3 to 5 years not 45 years like you put it. He’ll probably do 2 years or just 1 or even less… or none at all.

Michael Cohen admits violating campaign finance laws in plea deal, agrees to 3-5 year sentence | Fox News

He is accused of tax fraud in his taxi business and operating illegal bank accounts. Who knows labda akimaliza atajilipa na book deals and movie rights to his tales. You hang with Trump, you make money.

Wacha hata hii kesi ya Trump sijui hush money, Clinton was fucking the help right in the white House… right in the oval office and they still couldn’t kick him out.

[SIZE=7]Michael Cohen admits violating campaign finance laws in plea deal, agrees to 3-5 year sentence[/SIZE]
http://a57.foxnews.com/images.foxnews.com/content/fox-news/person/c/samuel-chamberlain/_jcr_content/image.img.jpg/48/48/1529877047605.jpg
By Samuel Chamberlain, Adam Shaw, John Roberts | Fox News
[ul]
[li]Facebook[/li][li] [/li][li]Twitter[/li][li] [/li][li]Flipboard[/li][li] [/li][li]Comments[/li][li] [/li][li]Print[/li][li] [/li][li]Email[/li][/ul]
http://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/BrightCove/694940094001/2018/08/21/896/504/694940094001_5825062566001_5825062451001-vs.jpg?ve=1&tl=1Video
How Cohen plea could be problematic for President Trump
President Trump launches Twitter offensive against the special counsel investigation; chief White House correspondent John Roberts reports.
Michael Cohen, President Trump’s longtime personal attorney, admitted Tuesday to violating federal campaign finance laws by arranging hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal “at the direction” of then-candidate Trump.
In entering the plea, Cohen did not specifically name the two women or even Trump, recounting instead that he worked with an “unnamed candidate.” But the amounts and the dates all lined up with the payments made to Daniels and McDougal.
In total, Cohen pleaded guilty to five counts of tax evasion, one count of making false statements to a financial institution, one count of willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution, and one count of making an excessive campaign contribution.

he was kicked out soma history vizuri.