- Zinakuanga wapi haswa ?
- Ziko kwa offisi za IEBC ?
- Kwani wazee wa UDA wameka tu ivo wakijua kuna ma server mahali zoko na ukweli flani ya vile kulienda ?
- Si hizo ma server zingekua zilisafishwa kitamboooo ?
- Hizo ma server zikifunguliwa leo kuna ukweli wa maana utapatikana ?
This is just hot air.
Results we streaming online accessible to all stakeholders.
Hi yao rao ni hewa moto tu
Ata huyu whistleblower ni imagination of a senile mind.
zifunguliwe na mukifungua lazima ikuwe RAO alishinda mukifungua tupate Ruto alishinda hio ni wizi ilifanyika
Niaje mzito
Boycott safaricom is on. Maandamano Thursday and Monday are public holidays
Server inafunguliwa ya nini? The physical Form 34A at the polling station is final. If you cannot establish that there were any issues with Form 34A, then you have no case. The whole election rests on hiyo physical karatasi ya Form 34A, not in the servers.
This issue was conclusively dealt with in the Supreme Court judgment below:
Read: Supreme Court judges' presidential petition verdict in full, why Raila lost | Nation
On issue 2: The Court held that the petitioners failed to establish to the required standard that there was interference with the uploading and transmission of Forms 34A from the polling stations to IEBC’s public portal. This was because:
a) No credible evidence was presented to prove that anyone had accessed IEBC’s Results Transmission System or that it was possible, from the design of the system to intercept, detain and interfere with Forms 34A temporarily before uploading them back onto the Public Portal.
b) The Registrar’s Report revealed that the original Forms 34A from the contested polling stations, which were alleged to have been intercepted and interfered with, were exactly the same as those on IEBC’s Public Portal and the certified copies presented to the Supreme Court by IEBC under Section 12 of the Supreme Court Act.
c) The review of some of the logs presented by petitioners as evidence to support the claim of interference showed that they were either from the same logs used in the 2017 Presidential Election or were outright forgeries.
On issue 3: The Court established that there was no difference between Forms 34A uploaded on IEBC’s Public Portal, those received at the National Tallying Centre, and those issued to the candidates’ agents at the polling stations. This was because:
a) No credible evidence was presented to support the allegation that Forms 34A presented to the agents of Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Coalition Party differed from those uploaded to the Public Portal.
b) No admissible evidence was presented to prove the allegation that Forms 34A were fraudulently altered by a group of people in some place in Karen in Nairobi under the direction of persons named in the affidavit of John Mark Githongo and the video clip attached to it purporting to support these allegations was inadmissible for the reasons that the informant’s particulars were undisclosed, his statement and account of events, contained in the affidavits of John Mark Githongo were not only incredible but also amounted to hearsay.
c) The Form 34A for Gacharaigu Primary School which was sensationally presented by the 1st petitioner to show that one, Jose Carmago, accessed IEBC’s Results Transmission System and interfered with the result contained therein turned out to be no more than hot air and the Court was taken on a wild goose chase that yielded nothing of probative value.
Unajua uzito huwa in relation to male anatomy, the bigger the balls, the more uzito one carries.
Wanawake huwa how tight they’re mle, or hoe firm their chests (boobs) are, hence, the best way to address her is, 'her tightness or her firmness.
Ukubwa na udogo wa matako haupo, it’s not a factor.
hakuna information secret kwa server.
watu wawache ujinga.
tulichambua sheria za uchaguzi wa u-rice last year tukamaliza. the server issue is a non-issue.
unless ni server ya njeri.
@Server afinguliwe