Kavanaugh Questioned By Senate About Fourth Sexual Misconduct

[SIZE=7]Brett Kavanaugh Questioned By Senate About Fourth Sexual Misconduct Allegation[/SIZE]
An anonymous letter to Sen. Cory Gardner says the Supreme Court nominee assaulted a woman in 1998 after drinking at a Washington, D.C.-area bar.

By Doha Madani and Antonia Blumberg

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh answered questions about another potential accuser during a call with Senate staff on Tuesday.

Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) received an anonymous letter from a constituent accusing Kavanaugh of physically assaulting an unnamed woman he was dating 20 years ago, NBC first reported Wednesday. Senate staffers asked Kavanaugh about the incident over the phone, according to a redacted transcript of the call that was released by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

In the letter, dated Saturday, Sept. 22, the constituent claimed that in 1998, while Kavanaugh was authoring the Kenneth Starr report ― which laid the grounds for impeaching former President Bill Clinton ― he was socializing at a D.C. bar with the constituent’s daughter and four friends.

The constituent recounted the daughter’s version of events:
[INDENT]“Her friend was dating him, and they left the bar under the influence of alcohol. They were all shocked when Brett Kavanaugh shoved her friend up against the wall very aggressively and sexually. There were at least four witnesses, including my daughter. Her friend, still traumatized, called my daughter yesterday, September 21, 2018, wondering what to do about it. They decided to remain anonymous.”[/INDENT]
[INDENT][/INDENT]
Kavanaugh denied the allegation.
“We’re dealing with an anonymous letter about an anonymous person and an anonymous friend,” he told the committee, according to the transcript. “It’s ridiculous. Total twilight zone. And no, I’ve never done anything like that.”

HuffPost received an emailed copy of the letter from a spokesman for Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans. In an emailed statement, the spokesman told HuffPost the committee “regularly receives anonymous letters, some of which are viewed with credibility, but many of which are not.”

“To make sure no stone was left unturned, the committee asked Judge Kavanaugh yesterday about this anonymous letter. Judge Kavanaugh flatly denied any such event ever happened,” the spokesperson said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee “received an anonymous letter with no name, address or any other contact information,” the office of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the committee, confirmed to HuffPost on Wednesday.

Gardner’s office and the White House did not respond to HuffPost’s request for comment.

In the past month, three women have publicly accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct. Psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford alleges that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the early 1980s when they were both teenagers. Blasey claims Kavanaugh was drunk at a high school party when he pinned her down, groped her and attempted to take off her clothes without her consent. The judge has vehemently denied her allegation.

Two other women, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick, came forward this week with sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh, also from the 1980s.

Questioning about the anonymous letter to Gardner’s office begins on page 32 of the transcript below:

Ryan Reilly contributed to this report.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5bac1c50e4b0353bd2d0a163

Trump needs to withdraw Kavanaugh’s nomination before midterm elections. Enough is enough.

[ATTACH=full]196510[/ATTACH]

For once, we agree.

If the GOP loses the Senate in November, Trump’s candidate won’t be confirmed. This is very high stakes! He should dump Kavanaugh like yesterday.

Haiya!!

What if its just witch hunt…using sexual abuse as a weapon…once you are accused whether true or false you are done for…

Sure he could be innocent but we are running out of time. The way it works in America, the President nominates a SC judge and later the Senate confirms him/her through a vote. If, God forbid, Dems take control of the Senate during midterm elections in November, Trump may not have the chance to elect a conservative SC judge.

Isnt that his daughter? Watu waache porojo

“We’re dealing with an anonymous letter about an anonymous person and an anonymous friend"
That about tells you a lot about the witch hunt thats going on…Guilty till proven innocent…

I read that and just couldn’t stop shaking my head. Seriously is there any human on earth who can realistically be judged like that. Unless its Christ then with such accusation everyone can be found guilt of anything on that format. An anonymous letter from an anonymous person and collaborated by another anonymous friend. This is bullshit. Democrats haven’t learnt anything since trump victory. Get off the high pedestal and aloofness. Take on trump on issues and his ever so many goofs or be surprised they lose again.

If we subjected 90% of all men on what they did in high school/college when drunk, none of us would be fit to hold public office…

Speak for yourself please. We don’t need multitudes in public office, just those very few ones with outstanding morals. Dr. Ford is testifying right now. #I stand with survivors.

I speak on behalf of the many,I understand you are a woman and will approach this with some emotions…but just for a minute imagine he is innocent and the democrats are doing what they can to prevent his confirmation? What happened to innocent till proven guilty?

Trump always has haters … why cant the media let him be … we all have pasts … hatutashinda tukizunguka mlima moja

Certainly there’s an element of sabotage, but pretty boy Kavanaugh also has skeletons in the closet which warrant a closer look.

Oh and by the way, there’s evidence to show he demanded his law clerks “dress like models.” The women had to have a “certain look.” That paints the picture of a man who objectifies women for self gratification.

It’s no secret that Kavanaugh was a party animal from high school to Yale’s Greek fraternity but never faced the consequences for underage drinking or sexual assault because mum and daddy are both rich DC elites.

It’s too late now.

Why are they rushing the hearings instead of waiting for the FBI to disapprove these new allageations? Why did Drumpf withhold 93% of the Whitehouse records the committee asked for? Where there’s smoke, there’s a sneaky, incestuous politician.

No it’s not.

I didn’t think you actually paid attention.

If he’s innocent, it would be for his benefit that the FBI does the investigation. I’ve posted all the background information but you were too busy complaining to read it?