If there is Good Blood there MUST be Bad Blood. Tuseme tu ukweli, some stupidity is inherited

[SIZE=7]Majority of mathematicians hail from just 24 scientific ‘families’[/SIZE]
Evolution of mathematics traced using unusually comprehensive genealogy database.

https://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.38663.1472224160!/image/nature-maths-genealogy-1-sept-2016-b.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_300/nature-maths-genealogy-1-sept-2016-b.jpg
INTERFOTO/D. H. Teuffen/Mary Evans Picture Library
Anecdotally many mathematicians report a shared genealogy with Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler, born in 1707.
Most of the world’s mathematicians fall into just 24 scientific ‘families’, one of which dates back to the fifteenth century. The insight comes from an analysis of the Mathematics Genealogy Project (MGP), which aims to connect all mathematicians, living and dead, into family trees on the basis of teacher–pupil lineages, in particular who an individual’s doctoral adviser was.

The analysis also uses the MGP — the most complete such project — to trace trends in the history of science, including the emergence of the United States as a scientific power in the 1920s and when different mathematical subfields rose to dominance1.

Maths whizz solves a master’s riddle
“You can see how mathematics has evolved in time,” says Floriana Gargiulo, who studies networks dynamics at the University of Namur, Belgium and who led the analysis.
The MGP is hosted by North Dakota State University in Fargo and co-sponsored by the American Mathematical Society. Since the early 1990s, its organizers have mined information from university departments and from individuals who make submissions regarding themselves or people they know about. As of 25 August, the MGP contained 201,618 entries. As well as doctoral advisers (PhD advisers in recent times) and pupils of academic mathematicians, the organizers record details such as the university that awarded the doctorate.

Source: Gargiulo et al./MGP
Expand
Previously, researchers had used the MGP to reconstruct their own PhD-family trees, or to see how many ‘descendants’ a researcher has (readers can do their own search here). Gargiulo’s team wanted to make a comprehensive analysis of the entire database and divide it into distinct families, rather than just looking at how many descendants any one person has.
After downloading the database, Gargiulo and her colleagues wrote machine-learning algorithms that cross-checked and complemented the MGP data with information from Wikipedia and from scientists’ profiles in the Scopus bibliographic database.
This revealed 84 distinct family trees with two-thirds of the world’s mathematicians concentrated in just 24 of them. The high degree of clustering arises in part because the algorithms assigned each mathematician just one academic parent: when an individual had more than one adviser, they were assigned the one with the bigger network. But the phenomenon chimes with anecdotal reports from those who research their own mathematical ancestry, says MGP director Mitchel Keller, a mathematician at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia. “Most of them run into Euler, or Gauss or some other big name,” he says.
Although the MGP is still somewhat US centric, the goal is for it to become as international as possible, Keller says.
https://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.38673.1472224248!/image/proof.jpg_gen/derivatives/fullsize/proof.jpg
Monumental proof to torment mathematicians for years to come
Peculiarly, the progenitor of the largest family tree is not a mathematician but a physician: Sigismondo Polcastro, who taught medicine at the University of Padua in Italy in the early fifteenth century. He has 56,387 descendants according to the analysis. The second-largest tree is one started by a Russian called Ivan Dolbnya in the late nineteenth century.
[SIZE=6]Tracking history[/SIZE]
The authors also tracked mathematical activity by country, which seemed to pinpoint major historical events. Around the time of the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the First World War, there is a decline in mathematics PhDs awarded in the region, notes Gargiulo. Between 1920 and 1940, the United States took over from Germany as the country producing the largest number of mathematics PhDs each year. And the ascendancy of the Soviet Union is marked by a peak of PhDs in the 1960s, followed by a relative fall after the break-up of the union in 1991.
Source: Gargiulo et al./MGP

Gargiulo’s team also looked at the dominance of mathematical subfields relative to each other. The researchers found that dominance shifted from mathematical physics to pure maths during the first half of the twentieth century, and later to statistics and other applied disciplines, such as computer science.
Idiosyncrasies in the field of mathematics could explain why it has the most comprehensive genealogy database of any discipline. “Mathematicians are a bit of a world apart,” says Roberta Sinatra, a network and data scientist at Central European University in Budapest who led a 2015 study that mapped the evolution of the subdisciplines of physics by mining data from papers on the Web of Science2.

The bicycle problem that nearly broke mathematics
Mathematicians tend to publish less than other researchers, and they establish their academic reputation not so much on how much they publish or on their number of citations, but on who they have collaborated with, including their mentors, she says. “I think it’s not a coincidence that they have this genealogy project."
At least one discipline is trying to catch up. Historian of astronomy Joseph Tenn of Sonoma State University in California plans by 2017 to launch the AstroGen project to record the PhD advisers and students of astronomers. “I started it," he says, “because so many of my colleagues in astronomy admired and enjoyed perusing the Mathematics Genealogy Project.”
Nature 537, 20–21 (01 September 2016) doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20491
[ul]
[li]Davide Castelvecchi’s genealogy goes back to Leonhard Euler, via Joseph-Louis Lagrange; to Friedrich Leibniz, the father of the co-inventor of calculus; and to thirteenth-century Persian astronomer Shams ad-Din Al-Bukhari.[/li][/ul]

Yah yah.

Same will go for notable engineers and other scientists. Probably even cartographers and musicians and botanists. Reason. then you acquired knowledge by patronage. How do you expect saitoti would be related to these people? You were either close to aristocracy or in the aristocracy to get properly educated. Son of a peasant remained son of a peasant and died a peasant even if he had a brain the size of a melon. Look it up.
knowledge moved about a few people. printing press came and they restricted it to schools and introduced certificates to keep it controlled and to discourage informal learning(taking knowledge outside approved circles) because you wouldnt get certificate. internet came in 1991 and its now a crisis pending.

Even if you pick a professor of mathematics at UON, Moi or any other college. ata huyo saitoti. trace back their patrons in the trade a few generations. i dont think you need to go more than 20 or 30 steps back before you run into gauss, Euler, Leibniz or someone else like that. In fact when you get to early 19th century, it becomes a very thin family tree. When it comes to enlightenment we are really some of the first.

you mean to tell me that 24 people made my life miserable in school? ferk those 24 families:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D…wait,how did the neanderthal count his wives?

Sometimes this thing runs in the blood. I reckon because my dad was a maths tutor, one of my brother is BSc maths major, two are in engineering fields while i also did a math related course.

Wapi Saitotis

Walisema Kinuthia alikuwa a man of impotence, so gene pool ikafifia hivo tu.