This is for dipstet scions and dipstet lackeys in the kijiji. Mbirioneas and tugeges mnaeza kaa kando
I’ll use three grounds as pinpoints/questions for the discussion
- Is Gachagua mentally handicapped, gullible or just plain cocky ?
- Is Gachagua business savvy or smart enough in the art of the deal ?
- Does Gachagua understand Public Relations and have enough Emotional Intelligence for an officer of the state ?
Beyond the hall of mirrors of political charades, the impeachment of Gachagua itself should be a indictment on his own character. The fact that he didn’t foresee this betrayal nor have a contingency plan were it ever to happen reflects badly on him. Even after that, his own delusions once the knives were out paints a different picture of the man. He aired all the family dirty laundry even before a formal subpoena, where he would have gamed the legal system to prolong as much as possible.
When Kingi, Madvd and Uhuru back in 2013 and ‘17 were signing documents under oath they were clearly the stupid ones. Only High IQ Rigathi Gachagua could definitely prove that Ruto was a ‘Godly’ man and betrayal is a vice that can scare Nabii from the embers of hell into keeping his word. For a wealthy man like him it’s difficult to understand how he has sustained his loot it if his own dealings are as kienyeji as his political dealings. Some of the now public schemes are not that sophisticated. This proves a pattern of behaviour – he lacks foresight and worst of all the humilty of consultations. Gathecha and Nabii with all their flaws, consult heavily with PR advisers, lawyers, inner circles and family. Gachagua exemplifies the Nabii’s attitude of ‘I know better’ to whole new dimensions.
As both a high ranking state officer and member of the Foreign Affairs Inner circle, should there be an audit of the dealings he had ? Not criminal dealings necessarily, just legal probing and economic analysis of the deals he might have made for the state and on behalf of the state. Were there any gentleman unwritten agreements ? How economically sound are they? Can they be enforced ? What are the legal liabilities undertaken by his dealings ? Basing on his emotionality, were there non-objective deals he might have made out of anger or happiness?
