Congrats Grandma! 
This 56 year old hag Esther Musila has pulled it off, and is bragging about “feeling kicks” from her so-called pregnancy with her 33-year-old boy toy Guardian Angel.
This 56 year old hag Esther Musila has pulled it off, and is bragging about “feeling kicks” from her so-called pregnancy with her 33-year-old boy toy Guardian Angel.
1 Like
AI. But it’s still possible for her to be pregnant. Bora akuwe ready kuomba mayai. Angel can still supply healthy sperms
Mkonna which mbwa hizi , was Sarah an hag ?even Tamar daughter of Judah waited for his younger son
We are not stopping!
55-year-old ESTHER MUSILA mocks critics as she prepares to celebrate 4th marriage anniversary with her 36-year-old Ben 10 husband, GUARDIAN ANGEL on Jan. 3 …No Pregnancy in site…
She should have gotten a surrogate to carry for her, at her age she’s risking. Happy for her. Women who are very healthy and haven’t used hormonal contraception like our grandmothers were known to get pregnant upto age 60. I also saw a woman who followed certain health protocols who had even stopped getting her menses again, started getting them again and although she didn’t want more kids as she was over 55, still got Pg naturally. Mambo ni mengi kwa hii dunia.
1 Like
Don’t give them that much credit…they’re not that creative.
The Mirror of Justice"
The widow or widower legally loses rights to the spouse’s inheritance once they remarry because they would then transfer property to the new spouse who has no rights to such property
"It is easy to trend on social media by claiming to be a victim of ‘bullying’ because of who you choose to love. But while the court of public opinion is distracted by age gaps, the High Court of Kenya was looking at a much darker reality: the attempt to disinherit children.
The case of Esther Musila vs. Gideon Mallan is a powerful lesson. You cannot claim to be ‘bullied’ by the public when a Judge has found that you used ‘fraudulent misrepresentation’ and ‘non-disclosure’ to hide assets from your own children.
Facts don’t care about feelings:
- The Law is Clear: Once you remarry, your ‘life interest’ in your late husband’s estate dies. You cannot have your cake (a new marriage) and eat it too (exclusive control of the ex-husband’s wealth).
- Baseless Labels: Attempting to label your son a ‘drug addict’ to deny him his inheritance—only for the court to find him perfectly sound and capable—is the ultimate form of ‘home-based bullying.’
Who was advising her legally? To fight the world on Instagram while fighting your own blood in court over money that belongs to them is a tragedy. We must stop using ‘sovereignty’ in our homes to oppress our children while crying ‘victim’ to the public.
Diplomacy begins with honesty. If you want to move on with a new life, do so with clean hands. Don’t claim to be bullied when the court records show you were the one holding the gavel over your children’s future.
The widow or widower legally loses rights to the spouse’s inheritance once they remarry because they would then transfer property to the new spouse who has no rights to such property
The case of Esther Musila versus her son Gideon Mallan is not only intriguing, but also a powerful lesson to widows who assume they can deal with a deceased spouse’s estate without involving their children or other beneficiaries.
Esther was married to a wealthy businessman, Erick Kiptanui Naibei. Upon his death in 2016, he left behind a substantial estate comprising shares, real property, and significant cash holdings in various bank accounts.
Following his death, Esther was appointed as the administrator of the estate, giving her legal authority, under a grant of letters of administration to manage the assets on behalf of the beneficiaries, who are her children.
However, her eldest son, Gideon Mallan Naibei, opposed her actions, including her marriage to Guardian Angel, citing concerns over their close age difference.
He later petitioned the court, arguing that since all beneficiaries were adults, the estate should either be jointly administered or distributed so that each beneficiary receives their rightful share.
In response, Esther alleged that Gideon was a drug addict and therefore lacked the legal capacity to participate in the administration of the estate or manage his inheritance. This formed a key part of her defense in opposing his application.
The court, however, carefully examined these claims, including ordering relevant assessments, and found no evidence to support the allegation. On the contrary, Gideon was found to be of sound mind, gainfully employed, and capable of managing his affairs.
Further, the court established that the initial grant of letters of administration obtained by Esther was based on fraudulent misrepresentation.
There were notable inconsistencies, including questionable signatures and deliberate non disclosure of certain assets, particularly shares, indicating an attempt to conceal parts of the estate from the rightful beneficiaries.
A major turning point in the case was Esther’s remarriage to Guardian Angel. In legal terms, remarriage can affect a widow’s standing, especially where her role as sole administrator is concerned.
The court found that her remarriage undermined her exclusive authority to administer the estate.
Consequently, the High Court revoked her grant of letters of administration and ordered that the estate be distributed equally among the three children; Gideon, Gilda, and Glen.
Additionally, her remarriage significantly weakened her claim as a beneficiary of the estate.
Watoto wengi sana have been disinherited juu ya hiyo upuzi ya “life interest”. Unapatanga the man died without a will. The woman is a bimbo who wastes the assets with Ben 10s or is conned large sums by some cunning pastor. Watoto wanabaki bila kitu juu their residual interest only kicks in when she dies or remarries.
Most of the wamama wa Harrier you see are busy chopping their children’s inheritance with Ben 10s and pastors.
2 Likes
