Detailed Analysis: Why Arabs Lose Wars?

Bonobos tuko kwa hii whatsapp group

2 Likes

The usa is why people lose wars

2 Likes

Arabs are worst race in the world

2 Likes

Hio vida ni sponsored by CIA kropakanda

1 Like

US loses wars too Vietnam and Afghanistan comes to mind.

2 Likes

Allah is not Akbar

2 Likes

Ww1 they helped the allies win
Ww2 same thing
Vietnam and Afghanistan they “lost” but ruined those countries.

War is in their DNA as Alexander the Great and his mum seemed to conclude. I think they need external violence and instability to gain internal peace and stability. Mohammed’s violent Islamisation was not unique but the known way of pushing one’s agenda through, so he simply replaced some Arabic war cry with “Allahu Akbar” As he used to say when he besieged a people, “My sword or my peace”

3 Likes

Taliban was never defeated and the communists are still in power in Hanoi we can’t call that winning.

1 Like

AI voiceover is a NO for me. Script likely generated using AI too.

The US never lost either of those wars. The thing is that in the case of Vietnam, the political pressure to withdraw actually came just as it was about to win that war. In fact, the US won every battle in Vietnam. The problem was that it lost over 50,000 soldiers in the process and that was too much for many Americans who did not see the massive losses in some country most did not even know on a map.
Mind you Vietnam’s losses were basically approaching depopulation level in some areas. There were 2 million Vietnamese dead, like 6% of the population.
Also, the NVA was not hostile to the US after the war. To this day, Vietnam and the US have a strong trade relationship.

The US never lost in Afghanistan either. Indeed, this is often seen as one of Biden’s pussifications. The US held the Taliban at bay with only 2,500 troops(mind you it has over 20,000 in Korea and Japan) . Many in the Democrat camp (think the Far Left) in their typical capitulation to Islamists thought the Taliban would be less extreme compared to the 1990s. They are actually worse, even openly saying women belong in 2 places; inside the house or the grave.

But the US chose to leave. It was not pushed out of either of those nations. Politics forced it to withdraw from Vietnam and Afghanistan, not defeat.

Largely false. Arabs like the Nabateans, after Romanization were very civilized. They built Petra.
The Ghassanids and Lakhmids, while often fighting each other on behalf of their Byzantine and Sassanid overlords were also pretty okay socialwise as Christianity had started to break down their tribal structure until Islam took them back to a tribal structure that forces them to fight on a clan basis to this day. Their descendants are the tribal Syrians of Daraa and the Shia of Eastern Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Bahrain. Notice how except the Bahraini ones, the rest are some of the most backward people mentally even by Arab standards.
Put it simply, Mohammed’s attempt at uniting the Arabs past their tribes failed and today the only “Arabs” who have overcome tribal animosity are the ones who never had a tribe in the first place because they are not really Arabs but converts who nowspeak Arabic like the Egyptians, Levantine Syrians, The (very few) Palestinian communities which, are of Jewish, Samaritan and Christian descent and the Lebanese(who have sectarian divisions, but not tribal ones).
The entire Gulf, Iraq ,Libya, Morocco, Algeria, Northern Sudan(where the Arabs infected the Africans with their tribal structure. What is with Africans and always apeing their overlords),Mali and Chad, Arab are divided deeply based on tribe, to the point that even religion cannot overcome those divisions.

3 Likes

You say they were “civilised”(hmm) “after Romanisation”, I said itt in their DNA. Aren’t you agreeing with me?

True