CLINTON EMAIL: WE MUST DESTROY SYRIA FOR ISRAEL....

A leaked Hillary Clinton email confirms that the Obama administration, with Hillary at the helm, orchestrated a civil war in Syria to benefit Israel.

The new Wikileaks release shows the then Secretary of State ordering a war in Syria in order to overthrow the government and oust President Assad, claiming it was the “best way to help Israel”.

Newobserveronline.com reports:

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.

http://cognitiveliberty.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/clinton-email-syria-israel.jpg
Clinton’s email on Syria-Israel
“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.

Even though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.

She specifically links Iran’s mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.

Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to be destroyed.

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.

If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

It is, Clinton continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.

This would not come about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”

The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.

Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.

Clinton goes on to asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” to do:

In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

The email proves—as if any more proof was needed—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.

It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.

In addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of war in Syria.

The real and disturbing possibility that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people—could become the next president of America is the most deeply shocking thought of all.

Clinton’s public assertion that, if elected president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.

http://cognitiveliberty.net/2016/clinton-email-we-must-destroy-syria-for-israel/

Go Trump.

I hate this bisch

3 Likes

agreed but this can also be said about Trump… U.S. foreign policy will not change much with either of them at the helm… especially when it comes to the Middle East.

2 Likes

She perking up her lips to kiss the presidency away…so much for you co wife wa Lewinsky

This is just hogwash…That’s a fake email. In four months El Presidente will be HRC.

I don’t know how these psychopaths are able to sleep. Because they are PSYCHOPATHS, when you really think about it. Right now, I am seeing them make noises about the deaths of a dozen French children in Nice. Just think of the number of babies who have died in their cots in Libya and Iraq, two needless wars. Think of the number of kids - humans like you and me - who have died in the Med. Then unaona mtu akiongea hapo about human rights and shit. I hate ISIS and Al Qaida, but the likes of HRC and GWB are the same - murderous killers. I only wish they could kill each other without hurting so many people…

7 Likes

Vile @xuma atasema

Hehehee Lets just say if the bisch was the devil’s daughter, then you just endorsed the devil himself…

3 Likes

Go Bish.
I hate this Trump…

And Trump is any better?

Yeah by a long shot.
Trump is even considering engaging the Russians & Chinese.
He’s right on many accounts including deportation of illegal Africans and Mexican immigrants

:p:p:p

He seems like the sort of person who will spend most of his time on domestic issues rather than lording over other countries which has borne more evil than good.
ISIS, Alqaeda & Alshabab are as result of America unsuccessful hand in Iraq, Lybia Syria and to some extent Somali where secular leadership was deposed in the guise of democratization

1 Like

You wouldn’t be so different going by the vehemence and vindictiveness with which you insult and sheer tribalism you display here.You’d be just another psychopath in the making???

Gaddafi age zikwa na torch huyu bish angekua history.

Hii mambo hainihusu ndewe wala sikio therefore am outta here

1 Like

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmtQ0BTWAAAooKt.jpg:small

American policy has been of self interest all along.Go HRC!

It is sad this is what the world has come to. Kids can’t even play with gun replicas toys without an image of terrorists coming into my head. I myself who used to make rifles using black PvC pipes. Maaaan!

2 Likes