@admin ng’oa ii meffi ya huyu homosexual
It’s like asking mkojo ama mevi who will come out first - you are either of them or both
That pic is an exact rendition of what a flat earther thinks about the world
America have never been in any war,labda zile zao za East and West revolution,civil and mere disputes,others have been pure occupation .up to 1995 they’ve lost whatever “war” they left american soil for. If indeed america was to go to war,it would have been with russia but we know how ‘close’ that was…
[ATTACH=full]329183[/ATTACH]
Pseudo Gringos,come at me :D:D:D
Rather one-dimensional analysis that glosses over a lot of crucial points. But I suppose that is the point of propaganda.
China would be wiped out faster than Iraq.
Naturally they are a weak people. Japan wiped their ass with them. But they would call for assistance. Whether Putin would come to their aid or not is another matter altogether.
I knew I wouldn’t miss a comment from KTalk’s leading W̶a̶n̶k̶e̶r̶ military specialist and expert on geopolitics.
[ATTACH=full]329189[/ATTACH]
Remember that Russia doesn’t have the satellite States or buffer zone protecting her? Would she be overrun by these weak small states i.e Ukraine, Poland, Latvia etc? Can a weakened Russia go down to these small fuckers? What if Russia calls for her old alliances Vietnam, Cambodia, North Korea, Iran… and they agree?
America has fought a number of wars with countries that were powerful at the time:
- The war of 1812 against the Brits. At this time the brits were very powerful and treated Americans with madharau. Yani one of the American grievances was that the Brits would kidnap American sailors and force them to serve in the Royal Navy
- They fought a number of wars with the Canadians in the 1800s.
- The war with Mexico circa 1840s when they were still a minor power
- War with spain circa 1890 when they took over the phillipines from the spanish.
- WW1
- WW2
- After WW2, they have been involved in numerous engagements around the globe
The chinese on the other hand, have not been involved in any major military engagement for centuries. They have mostly had turmoil and revolution. They technics in modern warfare remain largely untested.
I’d love to hear one or 2 of the crucial points you mentioned…
Wacha Ujinga. If you have nothing to say, dont say it here
io documentary ni mwitu
The video didn’t reference the South China Sea because it was mostly focused on the direct military to military comparison with the US. China has been strengthening economic ties with India’s neighbors Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to significantly increase Chinese strategic influence in that area.
Then there’s Russia, a key ally. Turkey and most of the developing world has also been leaning towards China in recent years. They’re offering infrastructure, broadband, e-commerce, high-speed trains, all kinds of ‘goodies’ if these countries let the Chinese come in and take over their local economies.
Point being the US doesn’t have to go to war with China to win or lose. Modern warfare is much more complex than logistics and personnel. If it was that simple the US would have conquered the Middle East decades ago.
The Chinese are practical and very patient people. They think in terms of generations and centuries, not months or years like Westerners. They will plan strategically, through economics, diplomacy, intrigue, subterfuge, whatever…and when the time is right, when America is eventually weakened and gutted by socialism, then they will use military force.
PS, the United States would never invade a country with the largest standing army in the world.
I like how you use the term ‘took over’,‘numerous engagements’ . Where did they fight the brits? in england? The spanish,in spain? Or vice versa? I believe the key word was occupation that is not a war,those are just sustained fights over land,like the mau mau,they fought for freedom,the courier corps and buffalo soldiers went to war. Im talking about iran iraq,or egypt israel kind of manly war